Categories
Selected Articles

I was successful but depressed at 41. I found a fulfilling side hustle in therapy, and negotiated a 4-day week to pursue it.

A headshot of Ben Tye.
Ben Tye is the CEO of Gate One

  • Ben Tye is the CEO and managing partner of a business consultancy.
  • He is also a qualified and practicing psychotherapist, who sees private clients every Monday.
  • When negotiating a four-day week, he argued that stepping away from work would give him a fresh perspective.

This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with 55-year-old Ben Tye, the CEO of Gate One, who is based in London. The following has been edited for length and clarity.

My late 30s and early 40s were a difficult time. I had a successful career in management consulting, yet I was struggling with what I now know was depression and anxiety.

When I was 41, I started seeing a psychotherapist who recommended a book called “The Middle Passage” by James Hollis, which is about making the second part of your life, after your 40s, richer and more meaningful.

It really spoke to me and helped me to understand that, for some, midlife is a time of necessary suffering in order to prompt questions like, “who am I really?” and “what does my life want from me?” rather than, “what do I want from life?” It’s really quite profound and far from any “self-help” manual.

Six years later, in 2017, I began studying and training during the evenings and on weekends to qualify as a psychotherapist. It involved a one-year foundation certificate, a four-year post-graduate diploma, and a two-year research component.

All the while, I continued having my own therapy sessions on Tuesday evenings. That was while I was also running my own consultancy business.

The psychotherapy training took six and a half years and over 700 hours of supervised client contact time.

Ben Tye with fellow counselling students in London.
Ben Tye with fellow counselling students in London.

I pitched my four-day week as a way to get a fresh perspective on the business

I joined Gate One in 2018, and in 2021, when I was a partner, I was given permission to work a four-day week and run my own therapy practice on Mondays. We have a very flexible working policy so the negotiation I had with the company owners and other leaders wasn’t difficult.

I pitched that stepping out of the business a day a week would give me a fresh perspective and clearer headspace when I returned to work the next day. I recommend people who work a four-day week to have Mondays off, because it’s easier to start the week doing something else than it is to finish.

I typically see five clients a week out of a room in a beautiful building in central London’s Little Venice, overlooking a canal.

Ben Tye studying for his psychotherapy MA.
Ben Tye’s desk as he studied for his MA.

Little Venice is considered upmarket, but it’s a very mixed area socioeconomically, and clients bring a range of issues to sessions related to bereavement, addiction, relationships, work, their sense of self, and body image. I had experienced or known close friends, family, colleagues, and acquaintances who had experienced several of these issues.

My fee is £90 ($118) an hour, but I ask my clients to pay what they can afford. Even if it’s a symbolic amount, it represents an investment in themselves.

Mine and other people’s boundaries are clearer now

It’s been going well at work, as I make sure everyone knows what they should be doing when I’m off. The ability to delegate and trust people to do their work is a key leadership skill.

I received many in-person comments from colleagues, particularly women, who have said that they appreciated seeing a man in a senior role adopt a flexible working style. The policy has been in place for many years, but perhaps people felt it gave them “permission” to take advantage of it.

Two chairs face one another in Ben Tye's psychotherapy room.
Ben Tye’s psychotherapy room in London.

Balancing a third element of life alongside work and personal commitments brings boundaries more clearly into focus: yours and other people’s. There’s something really positive about having a better awareness of how one is spending one’s time, what one is working on at any given moment, and making sure things aren’t getting dropped or one isn’t taking too much on.

Completely separating myself from my work environment each week puts me in a very different headspace, which has helped me step away from the day-to-day business of being a leader. I’ll check my emails on a Monday evening after I’ve finished with my clients, and return to work on Tuesday with a fresh perspective.

I can’t give advice as a therapist, but I have to be direct as a CEO

But I do have to make sure I’m separating my two roles of psychotherapist and CEO.

Being a psychotherapist certainly makes you a good listener, gives you patience, and the ability to be curious and appreciate where others might be coming from. Work-wise, you also develop an understanding of group dynamics and the unconscious roles that people play.

As a leader, you have to be authoritative and direct, while a therapist shouldn’t tell people what to do or give direct advice. There’s no way I would ever slide into therapist mode with colleagues or professional clients, because that boundary needs to be maintained really carefully.

Ben Tye stands beside a flipboard.
Ben Tye doing a talk at Gate One on his psychotherapy work.

I hope I can be a therapist for longer than I’m a business consultant

I haven’t considered going full-time as a psychotherapist, as I’m quite senior in my business career and like to think I can add a lot of value.

But I am 55 and heading toward that final furlong of my work life. One of the reasons I became a therapist is to work longer than I might ordinarily be able to do as a business consultant.

Since training as a therapist, I have also done a two-year psychodynamic executive coaching program. That takes the theories and practices of psychoanalytics and psychotherapy and applies them to coaching. That’s the third leg that sits between what I do as a psychotherapist, and what I do as a consultant and a business leader.

After I hand over the baton to Gate One’s next leader, I anticipate I will do a mix of executive coaching, leadership development, and psychotherapy.

Therapy has given me a nice pathway for the last third of my life, allowing me to extend my career and do something really interesting and fulfilling, as I begin to dial down my other commitments in years to come.

Read the original article on Business Insider
Categories
Selected Articles

I drive for Uber and Lyft in Hawaii. I earn less than I did driving a cab, but this benefit keeps me coming back.

Richard Detty, a ride-hailing driver in Honolulu, wears sunglasses, a dark grey Hawaiian shirt, and a kukui nut lei while smiling and giving shaka signs with both hands.
Richard Detty drives for Uber and Lyft part-time in addition to his business as an Amazon seller.

  • Richard Detty has driven for Uber and Lyft in Honolulu since 2017.
  • Detty says it’s a flexible side hustle, but Hawaii needs laws protecting drivers’ pay.
  • Some ride-hailing drivers have said their earnings have fallen over the past few years.

This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Richard Detty, a 58-year-old ride-hailing driver for Uber and Lyft in Honolulu. Business Insider verified Detty’s earnings through screenshots he provided of his payments. The interview has been edited for length and clarity.

A Lyft spokesperson told Business Insider that “ensuring driver success is vital to our mission, and we’re continually looking to increase driver pay in smart, deliberate ways.” For example, the company has pledged that drivers will make at least 70% of the weekly rider fares after external fees, and has recently started paying drivers for the time they wait for a rider, starting after one minute.

An Uber spokesperson said, “We’re committed to policies that support flexible work and sustainable earnings without reducing opportunities or raising costs for riders.” Most Uber drivers drive for the app part-time, the spokesperson said.

Rideshare is my side hustle.

I grew up on Kauai, Hawaii, and spent years on the US mainland. In 2017, I moved to Honolulu. My main business is selling products from Hawaii, such as mochi crunch cookies, on Amazon. When I’m not doing that, I drive for Lyft and Uber.

Tourism is a big industry here, and there are plenty of rides to take. I often drive between the airport, Waikiki, Pearl Harbor, and other places that tourists want to go. I feel safer driving here than on the mainland, where you never know who you’re going to pick up.

There are also some unique challenges. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve picked up riders with wet bathing suits at the beach and had to dry out my seats before my next ride.

When I was in college here in 1991, I drove a cab part-time two or three times a week. I would give the guy who ran the taxi yard $35, and I could drive from six at night to six in the morning. I paid for the gas, but the taxi company covered everything else, including maintenance.

Back then, a ride from Waikiki to the Honolulu airport paid up to $25. Now, Lyft and Uber are offering me up to $12 as the base rate for the same ride. When I first started driving for the apps here, that same trip would’ve paid $18. Without tips, I’m dead in the water.

I wouldn’t mind some of these rates if Uber and Lyft provided me a car. But I’m now responsible for all the costs. I have to handle all my maintenance, and if my car breaks down, I’m out of luck.

What makes the pay harder to shoulder is that Hawaii is an expensive place to live. Everything costs more here than on the mainland because everything has to be shipped here. I’ve paid more than $4 a gallon for gas at Costco, and I’ve seen milk here for around $8 a gallon. The base rate for rideshare drivers needs to go up here.

Driving for Uber, Lyft full-time didn’t work

When I moved back to Hawaii eight years ago, Lyft and Uber advertised that drivers could make up to $35 an hour. That was very easy to do at the time.

Now, they advertise that drivers make $27 an hour, yet if anything, the fares I’ve seen seem to have gone up in that time. Where did the other $8 go? For me, it’s been one pay cut after another.

In 2022, I worked full-time for Lyft and Uber. I did it for 10 months because I wanted to save money to invest in my Amazon business.

Around that time, I started to notice that the payments I got were falling. I found that doing this full-time wasn’t livable, so I went back to doing it as a side hustle. I drove 30 and 40 hours a week and put close to 1,000 miles on my car each week.

The only thing that keeps me coming back to Uber and Lyft is the flexibility. I can go in and out when I want. I think Uber and Lyft count on that: It seems like they want people to be part-time drivers.

I’m lobbying the Honolulu city council, the mayor, and the state legislature to do something about the pay situation for ride-hailing drivers. We need laws similar to those that gig workers in Minneapolis or Seattle have, which promise a minimum wage and provide other protections. I could make a decent living getting paid like that. In Minneapolis, drivers are being paid at least $1.28 a mile and $0.31 a minute. That’s close to double what I make.

We need a pay rate that’s fair. So many costs that have gone up. We need to be able to make a living.

Do you have a story to share about Uber or other gig work? Contact this reporter at abitter@businessinsider.com or 808-854-4501.

Read the original article on Business Insider
Categories
Selected Articles

Paris’ Louvre museum to increase ticket price for visitors from outside the European Union

Paris’ Louvre museum to increase ticket price for visitors from outside the European Union [deltaMinutes] mins ago Now
Categories
Selected Articles

Small boxes, big savings: Shop the best Black Friday jewelry sales

It’s the best time of the year to shop stars’ favorite brands without breaking the bank.
Categories
Selected Articles

Dyson, Shark and more editor-tested vacuums are on sale for Black Friday

Make cleaning easier, buy the vacuum.
Categories
Selected Articles

Israeli forces kill at least 10 in southern Syria raid, residents say

Categories
Selected Articles

Trump is changing student-loan eligibility for professional degrees. Here’s what you need to know.

President Donald Trump
President Donald Trump’s administration is placing new student-loan borrowing caps on graduate and professional degrees.

  • Trump’s student-loan repayment overhaul includes new borrowing caps for graduate and professional students.
  • It also reclassifies which programs are considered “professional” and eligible for a higher loan cap.
  • Advocates expressed concerns that the changes could strain those in healthcare professions.

This year, there’s a new topic to argue about at the Thanksgiving table: What is a professional degree?

It’s a question that President Donald Trump’s Department of Education recently addressed in its overhaul of student-loan repayment. That’s led to criticism from groups that are not included in the department’s narrower degree definition.

The crux of the issue is new borrowing limits. Trump’s “big beautiful” spending legislation that he signed into law in July included new borrowing caps on professional and graduate student loans, aiming to curb excessive borrowing: $20,500 a year for graduate students or $100,000 over a lifetime, and $50,000 a year for professional students or $200,000 over a lifetime.

In addition to the caps, the department also reclassified what constitutes a professional degree, narrowing it down to 10 programs, including dentistry, medicine, and law.

Some advocates said the department’s professional degree definition could strain student-loan borrowing access to those in the healthcare profession seeking post-graduate training, like nurses, although the changes won’t affect undergraduate borrowing.

“At a time when healthcare in our country faces a historic nurse shortage and rising demands, limiting nurses’ access to funding for graduate education threatens the very foundation of patient care,” Jennifer Mensik Kennedy, president of the American Nurses Association, said in a statement.

The Department of Education said that the new definitions only reflect which programs qualify for higher loan limits and are “not a value judgement about the importance of programs. It has no bearing on whether a program is professional in nature or not.”

Student-loan changes to professional degree programs

The Department of Education said 10 post-graduate programs will be counted as professional degrees and will be eligible for the higher student-loan cap: pharmacy, dentistry, veterinary medicine, chiropractic, law, medicine, optometry, osteopathic medicine, podiatry, and theology.

Preston Cooper, a senior fellow at the conservative think-tank the American Enterprise Institute, wrote in a Monday blog post that Congress “legislated only broad guidelines as to how graduate programs should be classified,” and the distinction between professional and non-professional programs was left to the discretion of the Education Department.

When it comes to nursing programs, Cooper said that the “new caps will affect only a small number of programs charging exorbitant prices.”

The Department of Education said that, based on its data, 95% of nursing students borrow below the new student-loan cap. The average cost of a master’s degree in nursing in 2020 ranged from $15,030 to nearly $43,000, per the National Center for Education Statistics.

The borrowing caps could strain other professions and cause some students to either forgo their advanced degrees or turn to the riskier, private lending market. For example, the Association of American Medical Colleges found that the median cost for four years of public medical school was $286,454 for the class of 2024. For law school, the average total cost was just over $217,000. The $200,000 lifetime cap would be insufficient to cover those tuition amounts.

While negotiations on the changes have concluded, the public will have an opportunity to comment on the proposals early next year before the department moves toward final implementation. The department said that it “may make changes in response to public comments.”

Read the original article on Business Insider
Categories
Selected Articles

Trump No Longer Held Criminally Accountable for Trying To Overturn Election

Trump now faces no criminal trial for efforts to overturn the 2020 election after state and federal cases collapsed.
Categories
Selected Articles

‘We’re going to see a lot of carnage’: VC investor says AI boom will create giants — and topple overhyped startups

A man near an electronic quotation board displaying the Nikkei 225 stock prices on the Tokyo Stock Exchange in Tokyo on November 5, 2025
Mel Williams, a partner and cofounder at TrueBridge Capital Partners, says the AI frenzy will mint a few giants while many overhyped startups collapse.

  • A VC investor said AI will create a handful of winners while overhyped startups may fail.
  • Early-stage AI companies are commanding soaring valuations despite lacking clear product-market fit.
  • VC in AI is overheated, he said, setting the stage for a harsh market correction.

The AI boom is only just beginning — and it may prove the most lucrative cycle in venture-capital history, even as it also leaves behind a wave of startups.

That’s according to Mel Williams, cofounder and partner at TrueBridge Capital Partners, a fund-of-funds manager with $8 billion under management that has backed firms such as Founders Fund, Thrive, and Sequoia.

While VCs pick startups, Williams’ job is to pick the VCs — giving him a rare, ecosystem-wide view of what’s coming.

His outlook: AI will create enormous value over the next decade, but a number of startups won’t make it out alive.

“We think we’re at the leading stages of an AI wave,” Williams said during an interview on Jack Altman’s “Uncapped” podcast released on Tuesday.

“We’re going to see a lot of carnage over the next 10 years. And we will see more value created over the next 10 years than we’ve seen in the venture industry,” he said.

A ‘frothy’ market — especially at the earliest stages

Williams described the early-stage AI environment as overheated.

Founders with the right résumés — often with experience at OpenAI or top labs — can raise massive rounds at lofty valuations with little proof their product works.

“At the earlier stages of the formation stages, where there’s less evidence of a product market fit, you do see founders with credibility, founders who could check a couple boxes raising large pools of capital at very high valuations,” he said.

Growth-stage deals, he added, look more reasonable, with valuations closer to public-market levels as investors focus more on real revenue.

AI will amplify the venture’s power-law dynamics

Williams believes AI is accelerating the power-law pattern that already defines venture capital: a tiny handful of companies drive nearly all the returns.

“The magnitude of the winners is even greater today than it has been in prior cycles,” he said. It “is going to be outsized in this market.”

He pointed to three forces intensifying that trend:

  • AI software scales instantly, with near-zero marginal cost.
  • Enterprises are aggressively adopting AI tools, with explicit budgets allocated for them.
  • Consumers jump in immediately, as seen with ChatGPT’s explosive growth.

The result: companies that get product-market fit could become market leaders quickly, while those that miss may stumble.

Outside AI, the venture market looks surprisingly healthy — but the fallout will still be brutal

Williams said the frenzy is largely confined to the field of AI. Outside of this, valuations remain reasonable, and capital still moves around milestones and revenue, he said.

The broader venture market, in his view, looks attractive compared to the overheated AI landscape.

But AI now accounts for 50% to 60% of all venture activity, he said — and that imbalance is setting the stage for a harsh correction.

Even if non-AI categories stay rational, Williams believes the sheer amount of capital flooding into AI will create a long trail of “carnage” as companies miss product-market fit or fail to justify their sky-high valuations.

“We’re in the early stages of that. There’s evidence that it’s working,” he said, but he added, “at the same time, it feels like a very frothy investment environment.”

Read the original article on Business Insider
Categories
Selected Articles

Elon Musk wants to dominate the in-flight internet market. Here are all the airlines that now offer Starlink WiFi.

A passenger using a laptop in British Airways business class
British Airways announced a deal with Starlink in November.

  • Emirates is the latest airline to sign up for Elon Musk’s Starlink WiFi.
  • 17 other carriers have also announced deals for the ultra-high-speed internet.
  • It’s already available on some airlines — here’s the full list.

Elon Musk‘s Starlink has gained yet another airline customer as the ultra-high-speed WiFi service continues to gain popularity.

On the first day of this month’s Dubai Airshow, Emirates announced that Starlink will be available for free, starting November 23.

Business Insider previously tested Starlink on Qatar Airways‘ first flight with it last October. The connection speed peaked at 215 megabits per second, more than enough for a lag-free video call, and faster than many cable-based internet services.

Starlink functions thanks to a constellation of over 7,000 satellites, which allows internet connections in remote locations, such as flying over an ocean. The satellites are in low-earth orbit, which means faster internet speeds — but also disrupts astronomers.

Starlink isn’t the only game in town, however.

JetBlue has signed up for Amazon Leo, which functions similarly, but has only launched 150 satellites so far.

Another in-flight WiFi rival is Viasat, which is used by Delta Air Lines and American Airlines. It only has a handful of satellites in a geostationary orbit, which have a longer time delay.

While it has rivals, Starlink wants to cement its dominance. As Starlink grows in popularity, it could be that more carriers sign up to Starlink to keep up with competitors. All airlines with Starlink offer it free of charge, although some require passengers to sign up for their loyalty programs.

As of the Emirates announcement, here are all the airlines that have publicly announced plans to launch Starlink:

Aer Lingus
Aer Lingus Airbus A330
An Aer Lingus Airbus A330.

The Irish flag carrier is part of International Airlines Group, which announced its Starlink deal in early November. It’s set to roll out Starlink from early 2026, but plans are still being finalized across the conglomerate.

Air Baltic
An Air Baltic jet in Latvian Livery
An Air Baltic Airbus A220.

Latvia’s airBaltic flies around Europe and the Middle East only using Airbus A220 jets. It was the first European airline to adopt Starlink, and hopes to complete installation on all its planes by the end of the year.

Air France
Air France airlines Boeing 777 takes off at Los Angeles international Airport on September 15, 2020 in Los Angeles, California.
An Air France Boeing 777.

The French flag carrier announced its Starlink deal last September, available to Flying Blue loyalty members. Installation began across its fleet, including regional planes, this summer.

Air New Zealand
An Air New Zealand plane flies in front of the Sydney skyline
An Air New Zealand flight arrives at Sydney Airport in Sydney, Australia.

Air New Zealand first said it was working with Starlink two years ago. It then rolled it out on two domestic aircraft in June, saying that it was “currently in the test phase.”

Alaska Airlines
A Alaska Airlines SkyWest Embraer E175LR airplane taxis to depart from San Diego International Airport to Sacramento at sunset on November 22, 2024 in San Diego, California.
An Alaska Airlines Embraer E175.

After merging with Hawaiian Airlines — the first major carrier to offer Starlink — Alaska Airlines announced its deal in August. It says it will first be available next year and will be rolled out across the fleet by 2027.

British Airways
A front-on image of a British Airways Boeing 787 plane.
A British Airways Boeing 787.

The UK flag carrier is also part of IAG. BA said it would start rolling out Starlink next year and that it would be available free of charge to all its passengers.

Emirates
Emirates Airbus A380 double decker passenger aircraft spotted flying in the air between the blue sky and the clouds, on final approach for landing on the runway of London Heathrow Airport LHR
An Emirates Airbus A380.

Dubai’s airline is starting to roll out Starlink this month and plans to add it to all 232 in-service aircraft by mid-2027. It’s also set to operate the first double-decker Airbus A380 with the service.

FlyDubai
A FlyDubai Boeing 737.
A FlyDubai Boeing 737.

The Emirati budget airline also announced its Starlink deal during this month’s Dubai Airshow. It only operates Boeing 737s and plans to install Starlink on 100 of them from next year.

Iberia
Mitsubishi CRJ-200ER for Iberia Air Nostrum.
Mitsubishi CRJ-200ER for Iberia Air Nostrum.

The Spanish flag carrier is also part of IAG. The conglomerate said it would roll out Starlink across its fleets from 2026.

JSX
A JSX plane.
A JSX plane.

JSX is a charter airline and was the first carrier to equip Starlink back in 2023. Its fleet is mostly made up of regional Embraer jets.

Level
A Level Airlines plane at Barcelona Airport.
A Level Airlines plane at Barcelona Airport.

Level is a budget airline based in Barcelona and is part of IAG. The airline’s parent company said it would roll out Starlink from 2026.

Qatar Airways
A Qatar Airways plane at an airport.
A Qatar Airways Boeing 777 at Athens International Airport.

Qatar Airways outpaced its regional rival, Emirates, by announcing Starlink back in May 2024. As of November, it operates the most wide-body aircraft with the service, numbering over 100. Starlink is installed on all Qatar’s Boeing 777s and is being rolled out to its Airbus A350s.

SAS
scandinavian airlines

Scandinavian Airlines, or SAS, is the flag carrier for Sweden, Denmark, and Norway. It announced Starlink in January and said the rollout would begin at the end of the year. Passengers would need to sign up for its EuroBonus loyalty program for free access.

United Airlines
A United Airlines airplane lands at Newark Liberty International Airport on November 8, 2025, in Newark, New Jersey.
United Airlines planes at Newark on Saturday.

United Airlines was the second US airline to announce a Starlink deal, but the first of the Big Three. It has installed the service on over half of its regional planes, and is continuing to roll it out across its whole fleet. The airline says customers will get a notification before their flight if it is equipped with Starlink. Passengers need to sign up for its MileagePlus loyalty program for free access.

Virgin Atlantic
Virgin Atlantic Airbus A350 coming into land.
A Virgin Atlantic Airbus A350.

Virgin Atlantic was the first UK airline to announce its deal with Starlink, which it did in July. Installation is planned to start in the second half of next year. Passengers will need to sign up for the airline’s Flying Club loyalty program to use it.

Vueling
Airbus A320 Vueling

Another IAG subsidiary, Vueling is a Spanish budget airline. Its parent company said it would roll out Starlink from 2026.

WestJet
Westjet Boeing 737-700

Canada’s WestJet started installing Starlink in February, and it’s now equipped on over 100 of its Boeing 737 jets. It plans for all its 737-800 and 737 Max 8s to have Starlink by the end of the year. Free access requires signing up for its loyalty program.

Zipair
ZipAir Boeing 787-8 takes off from Tokyo Narita International Airport.
ZipAir Boeing 787-8 takes off from Tokyo Narita International Airport.

Zipair is a Japanese budget airline and a subsidiary of Japan Airlines. It was an early adopter of Starlink, announcing its deal in early 2023, but doesn’t appear to have yet launched the service.

Read the original article on Business Insider