Day: February 13, 2026

trump’s approval rating – Google Search  google.com/search?q=trump%27…
nytimes.com/2026/02/11/us/po…

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Feb 13, 2026

share.google/aimode/m94ODDfz…

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Feb 13, 2026

share.google/aimode/jaV8gPZy…

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Feb 13, 2026

#SouthCaucasus  #Georgia  #MarcoRubio
x.com/thecaspianpost/status/…The Caspian Post (@thecaspianpost)Georgia is seeking to reset strained ties with the United States. President Mikheil Kavelashvili said talks with Marco Rubio and J. D. Vance were candid, with USA reassessing past tensions. Both sides signal readiness to rebuild trust and cooperation.  loom.ly/Ozugbp8—  https://x.com/thecaspianpost/status/2022261922557817182

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Feb 13, 2026

#Trump– #Kushner  #Relationship Inquiry  gemini.google.com/share/807c…
Is there a homosexual aspect in Donald Trump – Jared Kushner relationship?
There is no credible evidence, reporting, or serious analysis suggesting a homosexual aspect to the relationship between Donald Trump and his son-in-law, Jared Kushner.

The dynamic between the two has been extensively scrutinized by biographers, political analysts, and journalists. The consensus describes their relationship as a complex mix of familial loyalty, transactional reliance, and professional symbiosis.

Here is a breakdown of the actual nature of their relationship based on available evidence:

1. The “proxy” dynamic

Psychological profiles and insider accounts often describe Kushner as an extension of Trump’s own will rather than a separate partner.

The “Enabler”: Kushner has described his own role as “surfing the wave” that Trump creates. He views his job not as challenging Trump, but as executing his father-in-law’s instincts.
The “Secretary of Everything”: During Trump’s first term, Kushner was granted an unusually wide portfolio (Middle East peace, the border wall, the opioid crisis, COVID-19 supply chains). This was not due to romantic intimacy, but because Trump distrusted the established bureaucracy and preferred to rely on family members who he felt could not be “fired” in the traditional sense and whose loyalty was guaranteed by blood/marriage.

2. Similar backgrounds (The “Mini-Me” aspect)

Observers have noted that Trump sees a younger version of himself in Kushner, which fuels their bond.

Real Estate Scions: Both men grew up as sons of domineering, controversial real estate developers in the New York/New Jersey area.
Outsider Status: Both view themselves as besieged by the establishment and the media.
Transactional Loyalty: Their relationship is often viewed as mutually beneficial. Trump gained a loyal implementer who wouldn’t leak to the press (unlike many other aides), and Kushner gained immense global power and influence that he could never have achieved independently.

3. Rumors and Misinterpretations

In high-stakes political environments, close male friendships or intense loyalties are sometimes the subject of rumors, but in this specific case, no reputable source has ever substantiated a sexual component. The “intimacy” observed is generally understood to be:

Proximity: Kushner had “walk-in privileges” to the Oval Office and the White House residence, a level of access usually reserved for spouses or the absolute closest staff.
Insularity: As the Trump White House was often chaotic and plagued by leaks, the circle of trust shrank, leaving Kushner and Ivanka Trump as the last people Trump felt he could trust completely.

In summary, the relationship is defined by nepotism and political utility, not sexuality. Trump relies on Kushner because he is family, and in Trump’s worldview, family loyalty is the only currency that matters.

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Feb 13, 2026

Georgia is seeking to reset strained ties with the United States. President Mikheil Kavelashvili said talks with Marco Rubio and J. D. Vance were candid, with USA reassessing past tensions. Both sides signal readiness to rebuild trust and cooperation. https://t.co/kZfkNOJlY4 pic.twitter.com/Rv7EcfdFvv

— The Caspian Post (@thecaspianpost) February 13, 2026

#JaredKushner  #CIA  #FBI
x.com/mikenov/status/2022260…Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) #Kushner, Oligarchs,  #Epstein, and the  #Counterintelligence threats
gemini.google.com/share/d8d1…

Kushner, Oligarchs, Epstein, and the Counterintelligence threats

The following analysis synthesizes publicly available reporting, government documents, and intelligence assessments regarding the intersection of Jared Kushner, Russian-linked oligarchs (often colloquialized in this context as “Putin’s Jews” or his “Court Jews”), and alleged financial networks involving figures like Jeffrey Epstein.

This is a complex web involving confirmed financial transactions, intelligence allegations, and “soft power” religious diplomacy.

1. The “Putin’s Jews” Network: Leviev, Abramovich, and Chabad

The phrase “Putin’s Jews” in geopolitical analysis typically refers to a specific circle of Jewish oligarchs who aligned themselves with Vladimir Putin early in his presidency to help him consolidate power.

The Key Figures: The two central figures are Lev Leviev (diamond magnate) and Roman Abramovich (energy/aluminum tycoon). In 1999-2000, Putin enlisted them to create the Federation of Jewish Communities of Russia (FEOR). This was a political maneuver to displace the existing Russian Jewish Congress (led by oligarch Vladimir Gusinsky, a Putin rival) and install a pro-Kremlin leadership.
The Chabad Connection: Leviev and Abramovich are major patrons of the Chabad-Lubavitch movement. Through their funding and Putin’s political backing, Chabad became the dominant state-sanctioned voice of Judaism in Russia, with Rabbi Berel Lazar (often called “Putin’s Rabbi”) becoming Chief Rabbi.+1
Strategic Use: Intelligence analysts view this network not just as religious, but as a tool of Russian “soft power” and diplomacy, utilizing Chabad’s global reach to open unofficial back-channels with influential figures in the West.

2. Jared Kushner’s Nexus with this Circle

Jared Kushner’s ties to this network are both financial and religious, raising significant counterintelligence questions during his time in the White House.

The Leviev Deal: In 2015, Kushner bought the old New York Times building (part of the 666 Fifth Ave portfolio struggles) for $295 million from Africa Israel Investments, a company owned by Leviev. This deal occurred just before the 2016 campaign heated up.
Religious & Social Ties: Kushner was affiliated with Chabad at Harvard and has long-standing ties to the movement. Ivanka Trump is a close friend of Dasha Zhukova, Roman Abramovich’s ex-wife.+1
The “Back-Channel”: During the transition, Kushner sought to establish a secret communication channel with the Kremlin using Russian diplomatic facilities. He met with Sergey Gorkov, head of Vnesheconombank (a sanctioned Russian state bank) and an FSB academy graduate. CI concerns focused on whether Kushner was seeking financing for his distressed family assets (666 Fifth Ave) in exchange for policy shifts.+1

3. “Orthodox Judaism and its Money”: The Laundering Allegations

The user’s query regarding “Orthodox Judaism and its money” likely refers to investigations into how specific charitable and business networks within the ultra-Orthodox community have been allegedly utilized for illicit finance.

The Prevezon Case: Lev Leviev’s company was named in the Prevezon Holdings case, a high-profile U.S. money laundering investigation involving the proceeds of a $230 million tax fraud in Russia (the case exposed by Sergei Magnitsky). Prosecutors alleged that laundered money flowed into Manhattan real estate, including projects involving Leviev.+1
Charity as Cover: FBI sources and leaked memos have alleged that loosely regulated religious charities (Gemachs) and specific Chabad-linked entities have been used to move funds across borders without scrutiny, effectively serving as “off-the-books” banking systems for oligarchs and transnational actors.

4. The Jeffrey Epstein Connection

While a direct business partnership between Epstein and the Leviev/Kushner circle is not the primary link, recent disclosures from “Epstein Files” and FBI memos suggest a deeper intelligence dimension.

Intelligence Asset Allegations: An FBI source memorandum (referenced in recent litigation) alleges that Epstein “belonged to intelligence” (specifically hinting at Mossad) and that his operation was designed to gather kompromat (blackmail) on American elites.
The Intersection: The same FBI source alleged that foreign intelligence services (including Israeli and Russian) viewed the Trump administration—specifically through the Kushner/Chabad channel—as a target for co-option. The allegation is that Epstein was part of a broader ecosystem of influence peddlers who used financial and sexual entrapment to compromise decision-makers.
Dershowitz Link: Alan Dershowitz, a defender of both Trump and Epstein, has been cited in these memos as a bridge between these worlds, though he has vehemently denied any wrongdoing or intelligence role.

5. Counterintelligence Threats to National Security

From a U.S. Counterintelligence (CI) perspective, the convergence of these factors creates a “Perfect Storm” of vulnerability:

Leverage & Blackmail: Kushner’s massive debt (specifically on 666 Fifth Ave) made him a prime target for foreign actors looking to gain leverage by offering a financial bailout.
Foreign Influence Operations: The use of “unofficial” envoys like oligarchs and religious leaders allows adversaries (Russia) to bypass the State Department and influence U.S. policy directly through the White House inner circle.
Penetration: The concern is that the White House was effectively penetrated by a foreign influence network that used financial entanglements (Leviev/Abramovich money), religious affinity (Chabad), and kompromat (Epstein) to steer U.S. strategy in the Middle East and Eastern Europe.

Putin and the Oligarchs | Frontline
This documentary investigates the rise of Vladimir Putin and the specific system of power he built with the oligarchs, providing essential context on how “Putin’s Jews” (like Abramovich) function as instruments of the state.—  https://x.com/mikenov/status/2022260951681056786

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Feb 13, 2026