Month: November 2025

• Microsoft recently formed a new superintelligence team under Mustafa Suleyman.
• A renegotiated OpenAI deal lets Microsoft independently pursue artificial general intelligence.
• The team will build a “world-class, frontier-grade research capability in-house,” Suleyman tells BI.

In the race to build powerful artificial intelligence, Microsoft has had its hands tied behind it back for years. Now, the software giant is free to compete, according to top executive Mustafa Suleyman.

Suleyman recently unveiled a superintelligence team at Microsoft and he spoke with Business Insider about how this came about and the company’s future plans.

What’s clear from the interview is that Microsoft will aggressively pursue artificial general intelligence, technology capable of outperforming humans in a wide variety of tasks.

While Suleyman has rejected narratives about a race to AGI, the new unit puts the tech giant in more direct competition with its partner OpenAI and other companies, including Anthropic, Google, and Meta.

The superintelligence team will focus on building a “world-class, frontier-grade research capability in-house,” Mustafa, Microsoft’s AI CEO, told Business Insider in a recent interview.

“Microsoft needs to be self-sufficient in AI,” he said. “And to do that, we have to train frontier models of all scales with our own data and compute at the state-of-the-art level.”

This is a major departure from Microsoft’s approach in recent years. The company mostly focused on building smaller models, post-training existing models for new purposes, and channeling resources toward OpenAI instead of trying to build in-house frontier models that would compete with the startup’s GPT offerings.

Previous limitations

A big reason for this narrower strategy was Microsoft’s previous agreement with OpenAI. That deal barred Microsoft from developing its own AGI through 2030, according to a person familiar with the matter. This reflected OpenAI’s desire to maintain control over frontier AI development while relying on Microsoft for cloud infrastructure and capital investment.

The two companies recently renegotiated this partnership. The new deal lets Microsoft “independently pursue AGI (artificial general intelligence) alone or in partnership with third parties.”

Loftier goals

That’s freed Microsoft to pursue loftier goals. The new team, called Microsoft AI Superintelligence, has big ambitions for what AI will one day be able to achieve.

Potential future applications include healthcare, energy, transportation systems, and reducing the “cost of living for billions of people over the next 10 years,” Suleyman said.

The team’s remit will be to focus on solving fundamental problems that present barriers to the creation of those applications, Suleyman said. Two examples he cited: How to transfer learning so AI models can teach other models new knowledge, and continual learning to add knowledge to existing neural networks.

Suleyman said Microsoft is making major investments in compute through partnerships with Nvidia, as well as expanding its own chip development and AI-optimized cloud infrastructure that allows training and inference capacity to be shared more efficiently.

Keeping an open mind

Suleyman recently said in an internal meeting reviewed by Business Insider that Microsoft plans to make “significant” investments in its own AI chip cluster to help the company build its own models. These custom chips are part of Microsoft’s broader push to reduce reliance on third-party hardware and improve performance across Azure’s AI services.

“It’s the number one priority for us to make sure this is the most performant infrastructure in the world,” Suleyman said during that meeting.

In his interview with Business Insider, Suleyman said Microsoft will keep an open mind about what models it uses, including open-source offerings, Anthropic models, OpenAI models — and Microsoft’s own creations, known as MAI models.

“There’s no reason for us to be religious about that,” Suleyman said. “Obviously, we’re very focused on getting our products working.”

The adult in the room

As Microsoft enters a crowded field of companies with their own superintelligence teams, including Meta, Google, Anthropic, and Elon Musk’s xAI. Microsoft is trying to position itself as the adult in the room, emphasizing responsibility and safety.

“This isn’t about some directionless technological goal, an empty challenge, a mountain for its own sake,” Suleyman wrote in a blog announcing the new team.

In the interview with Business Insider, Suleyman declined to elaborate on which competitors he sees as directionless, but said he believes everyone will get behind developing AI that’s aligned to human interests.

“That should be something we all take for granted, but it actually needs to be stated and repeated, and it needs to be the No. 1 most important thing that humanity focuses on,” Suleyman said. “There’s a risk with these systems that they get extremely smart and run away from us, and we have to design them so that they don’t do that. That requires a humanist intent, which keeps humans at the top of the food chain.”

The team is making significant investments in safety. Suleyman recently added Trevor Callaghan, a former general counsel from DeepMind and legal director at Google, to his leadership team as vice president of responsible AI, according to an organizational chart recently viewed by Business Insider.

The new team comes at a pivotal moment for Microsoft, Suleyman said.

“We’ve got a huge mission ahead of us,” Suleyman said. “We have $300 billion of revenues, a huge responsibility to make sure that all of our products are AI-first, that we deploy agents everywhere, and we really make all the workflows that customers use today much more intelligent.”

“We have the data, we also have the distribution, and we have the user interface,” he added. “So I think it’s just a matter of time before these things become really, really magical.”

Have a tip? Contact this reporter via email at astewart@businessinsider.com or Signal at +1-425-344-8242. Use a personal email address and a nonwork device; here’s our guide to sharing information securely.

• DoorDash was the fastest-growing brand of 2025, according to a Morning Consult survey.
• Baby boomers have turned to the brand this year, the survey showed.
• Demand for food and grocery delivery has remained steady even as consumers cut spending elsewhere.

DoorDash appears to be getting a boost from an unlikely group: baby boomers.

The delivery service topped Morning Consult’s list of the fastest-growing brands of 2025, according to a report released on Tuesday. The polling firm asked consumers which brands they planned to purchase from and created a measure called “purchasing consideration.”

Comparing data from the first quarter with the third quarter, Morning Consult found that consumers were planning to use DoorDash more than any other brand.

Don’t give the credit to millennials or Gen Z diners ordering burritos, though: boomers demonstrated the biggest increase in intent to place an order through DoorDash, according to Consult’s survey.

Young boomers, or those born between 1955 and 1964, were particularly interested in DoorDash, as were those who have been divorced or widowed, according to Morning Consult’s analysis.

While these boomers are in their sixties or entering their seventies, many are likely turning to DoorDash for convenience, Bobby Blanchard, senior director of audience development at Morning Consult, told Business Insider.

“This is an aging population,” Blanchard said. Whether they’re facing mobility challenges or don’t feel like shouldering the burden of cooking while living alone, a service like DoorDash “might help them maintain that sense of independence,” he said.

While DoorDash is well-known among younger diners, many older ones might be ordering from the company for the first time, Blanchard said. “Relative to boomers, they are a new brand,” he said.

Boomers are also more likely than younger generations to have more disposable income — and, thus, to be able to afford to order more dinners and grocery hauls for delivery, said Kayla Bruun, lead economist at Morning Consult.

“Being recognized as one of the fastest-growing brands is a reflection of the trust our customers place in us and the dedication of our teams who make that possible every day,” Jennifer Richardi, head of brand and creative at DoorDash, told Business Insider in a statement.

Younger adults are more likely to say that they’re cutting back on using DoorDash, Bruun said. Many Gen Z consumers, for instance, are strapped for cash and trying to find a job, as many entry-level positions are drying up. They’re cutting spending at Chipotle, Cava, and similar restaurants.

“Younger adults don’t have a lot of savings, don’t have a lot of investments, and they are also facing a tougher labor market,” she said.

Retailers have spent the last few quarters pointing to a divide between two types of consumers: shoppers who are cutting back and looking for deals, and those who keep spending, including on higher-end products.

Many shoppers are still willing to pay for delivery, though. DoorDash’s revenue increased by 24% during the first nine months of 2025, and its stock has risen by 20% so far this year. And demand for delivery is strong enough that retailers, from Walmart to Amazon to Dollar General, are speeding up delivery times for grocery orders.

Do you have a story to share about DoorDash? Contact this reporter at abitter@businessinsider.com.

President Donald Trump’s latest target in his campaign against mainstream media lies across the Atlantic.

The British Broadcasting Corp. has found itself embattled by conservative critics within the U.K. and beyond after reports that it had presented a misleading edit of Trump’s speech near the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. The BBC documentary program Panorama, which aired in October last year, spliced together two separate quotes from Trump’s Jan. 6 speech, which he gave to a crowd of his supporters that had gathered in Washington, D.C., to rally around the belief that the 2020 election had been stolen from Trump.

[time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”]

The program quotes Trump as saying, “We’re going to walk down to the Capitol and I’ll be there with you. And we fight. We fight like hell.” In fact, Trump made those comments at separate times in his speech: he said, “We’re going to walk down to the Capitol, and we’re going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women, and we’re probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them.” And around an hour later, he said, “We fight like hell. And if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.”

Some members of the crowd went on to storm the Capitol. Trump’s speech was a key part of his impeachment trial, in which he was accused of having incited his supporters to commit an insurrection.

The edit was raised in an internal memo first reported by the Telegraph. Michael Prescott, an independent advisor to the BBC on its editorial standards and guidelines, shared concerns about “systemic” bias and “inaction” by the BBC’s leadership to deal with problems in its news coverage. Prescott’s memo also raised concerns about the BBC’s coverage of racial diversity, gender identity, trans rights, and Gaza. Prescott, formerly the political editor of the Sunday Times, said in the memo that his concerns were not based on his own political views.

In the eyes of conservative critics of the BBC, the edit has affirmed their view of the public broadcaster’s institutional bias and renewed calls for it to be stripped of its licensing fee, which is part of the BBC’s Royal Charter that is currently under review ahead of its expiration at the end of 2027. Former British Prime Minister Liz Truss, a member of the Conservative Party, posted on X, “There is no such thing as an impartial institution now -if there ever was. They have all been captured … If the body is not necessary (eg the BBC) it should be defunded or abolished.” Nigel Farage, another opposition member of the British parliament as part of the right-wing populist Reform U.K. party that is leading in national polls amid frustrations with the Labor-led government, said he spoke with Trump last week. “To say that he was angry would be an understatement,” Farage said on LBC radio on Monday. Farage called for “wholesale changes” at the BBC and said the BBC’s mandatory TV licensing fee paid by U.K. households “cannot survive.”

On Monday, BBC Chairman Samir Shah apologized for the “error of judgment” in a letter to the parliamentary culture, media and sport committee, acknowledging that the edit gave “the impression of a direct call for violent action.” BBC Director-General Tim Davie and BBC News CEO Deborah Turness resigned on Sunday. Shah said the BBC has “published corrections where we have got things wrong; changed editorial guidance to make the BBC’s position on issues clearer; made changes to leadership where the problems point to underlying issues; and carried out formal disciplinary measures.”

Defenders of the broadcaster see the current onslaught on the BBC as politically motivated from the right. “The BBC is facing a coordinated, politically motivated attack,” John Simpson, a longtime BBC correspondent, posted on X. Robert Shrimsley, U.K. chief political commentator and executive editor of the Financial Times, posted, “The fact that the BBC has made serious culpable errors does not negate the point that there is a real and concerted right-wing media campaign to destroy it. Both points can be true at the same time and the campaign would not end even if the errors did.” Insiders at the BBC told the Guardian that the way Turness was ultimately pushed out was akin to “a coup.”

As the attacks on the BBC have reverberated beyond the U.K. all the way to Washington, D.C., the BBC has become just the latest media organization to come under the Trump Administration’s fire.

Trump sent a letter dated Sunday to the BBC threatening a lawsuit seeking at least $1 billion in damages if the news organization does not publicly apologize, compensate him for “harm caused,” and pull the documentary, which contained the edited remarks and aired before the 2024 U.S. presidential election.

“The TOP people in the BBC, including TIM DAVIE, the BOSS, are all quitting/FIRED, because they were caught ‘doctoring’ my very good (PERFECT!) speech of January 6th,” Trump posted on Truth Social on Sunday. “These are very dishonest people who tried to step on the scales of a Presidential Election. On top of everything else, they are from a Foreign Country, one that many consider our Number One Ally. What a terrible thing for Democracy!”

An attorney for Trump said Monday that the BBC had defamed him “by intentionally and deceitfully editing its documentary in order to try and interfere in the Presidential Election,” although it is not clear that the edit was an attempt at political interference.

It’s part of a pattern that has escalated during Trump’s second presidential term, as his Administration goes after perceived media adversaries, many of which have settled lawsuits with payments or otherwise capitulated to Trump’s pressure no matter the merit.

“News outlets really realize that spending a lot of time and money with Trump in court is not worth it for them,” Christina Bellantoni, a professor at University of Southern California’s Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism, told Bloomberg. “I worry in five years, our media landscape will be completely reshaped and some of these lawsuits are a factor in that.”

Here’s a look back at some of the past and ongoing media battles the Trump Administration has waged.

ABC’s suspension of Jimmy Kimmel

In September, ABC suspended late-night talk show host Jimmy Kimmel’s show Jimmy Kimmel Live! over on-air comments he made after the assassination of right-wing political activist Charlie Kirk. The suspension came after Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendan Carr threatened ABC with regulatory action and implied that the FCC could revoke ABC’s broadcasting license. Carr also appeared to threaten to revoke the broadcasting licenses of parent company Disney’s affiliate stations if they didn’t follow suit, which he denied.

Trump celebrated the suspension of Kimmel in a Truth Social post: “Great News for America: The ratings challenged Jimmy Kimmel Show is CANCELLED.” He appeared to also urge NBC to cancel the shows of late-night hosts Jimmy Fallon and Seth Meyers, adding in the post, “That leaves Jimmy and Seth, two total losers, on Fake News NBC. Their ratings are also horrible. Do it NBC!!!”

But others saw the apparent pressure of the Trump Administration on Disney as a blatant infringement of free speech and free press. Senate Republicans raised concerns about the FCC’s threats, while cancellations of Disney+ subscriptions spiked after Kimmel’s suspension.

After Disney reinstated Kimmel, Trump suggested he might take legal action. “Why would they want someone back who does so poorly, who’s not funny, and who puts the Network in jeopardy by playing 99% positive Democrat GARBAGE. He is yet another arm of the DNC and, to the best of my knowledge, that would be a major Illegal Campaign Contribution,” he posted on Truth Social in September. “I think we’re going to test ABC out on this. Let’s see how we do. Last time I went after them, they gave me $16 Million Dollars. This one sounds even more lucrative. A true bunch of losers! Let Jimmy Kimmel rot in his bad Ratings.”

Trump also sued ABC last year, alleging that anchor George Stephanopoulos’ comments saying Trump had been found “liable for rape” were defamatory. ABC agreed to settle the lawsuit, agreeing to pay Trump’s future presidential foundation $15 million. (Trump has been found civilly liable for sexual abuse—but not for rape—of writer E. Jean Carroll.)

Lawsuits against CBS

Trump sued CBS’ parent company Paramount last year, alleging that a segment on the newsmagazine show 60 Minutes had deceptively edited a quote from Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris. CBS denied the allegations and said the quote was trimmed in line with journalistic standards. Paramount, however, agreed at the start of July to pay $16 million to settle the lawsuit and to release transcripts of 60 Minutes interviews with presidential candidates in the future.

Days after late-night host Stephen Colbert mocked Paramount’s settlement with Trump, CBS said it was cancelling The Late Show With Stephen Colbert, citing financial reasons. At the time, Paramount still needed the FCC’s approval for its merger with Skydance Media, which was formally approved on July 24.

Read More: Kimmel and Colbert Cancellations Reveal Trump’s Media Suppression Strategy, Experts Warn

Carr also reopened a news distortion complaint over the same interview that had been dismissed by outgoing FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel. Trump urged him to “impose the maximum fines and punishment” on CBS. The complaint is currently under investigation.

Paramount Skydance has since seen a drastic remaking of the network. Its new CEO David Ellison, son of Oracle founder and Trump ally Larry Ellison, bought conservative-leaning media outlet the Free Press and appointed its founder Bari Weiss as the editor-in-chief of CBS. Weiss has already reportedly overseen significant layoffs and changes to the outlet’s editorial vision. Trump, who has publicly approved of Weiss’ work, praised the network’s new leadership and appeared on “60 Minutes” earlier this month.

Targeting public broadcasters

The Trump Administration has targeted publicly funded broadcasters, which the right has also accused of liberal bias. In a May executive order titled “Ending Taxpayer Subsidization of Biased Media,” Trump ordered the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) to cease federal funding for National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS). The CPB, a nonprofit corporation established by Congress, announced in August that it would shut down after Trump signed a law cutting $1.1 billion in public broadcast funding.

Like with ABC, Trump has also taken aim at other public broadcasters through the FCC. Carr has opened probes into NPR and PBS over sponsorship and underwriting practices.

Trump in March also signed an executive order effectively dismantling the parent organization of Voice of America, an international broadcaster established during World War II that served as an anti-propaganda tool to audiences and broadcasts in nearly 50 languages worldwide. The Trump Administration has moved to fire hundreds of employees from VOA, and the organization stopped broadcasting in October amid the government shutdown.

Lawsuit against WSJ over Epstein letter

Trump also filed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal, owned by media mogul Rupert Murdoch, over a July article that reported on an alleged message and lewd drawing by Trump to convicted sex offender and alleged sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein for his birthday.

Trump denied writing the letter, telling the Journal, “I never wrote a picture in my life. I don’t draw pictures of women. … It’s not my language. It’s not my words.”

Trump posted on Truth Social after the report was published, “The Wall Street Journal, and Rupert Murdoch, personally, were warned directly by President Donald J. Trump that the supposed letter they printed by President Trump to Epstein was a FAKE and, if they print it, they will be sued. Mr. Murdoch stated that he would take care of it but, obviously, did not have the power to do so. The Editor of The Wall Street Journal, Emma Tucker, was told directly by Karoline Leavitt, and by President Trump, that the letter was a FAKE, but Emma Tucker didn’t want to hear that. Instead, they are going with a false, malicious, and defamatory story anyway.”

The Journal, which didn’t initially print the letter in question but rather quoted and described it before the House Oversight Committee released it among records from Epstein’s estate, has defended its reporting, and filed a motion last month to dismiss the case.

“This meritless lawsuit threatens to chill the speech of those who dare to publish content that the President does not like,” the Journal’s lawyers wrote in a court filing. Attorneys for Trump have asked that the lawsuit proceed.

Lawsuit against NYT over election coverage

In September, Trump sued the New York Times and Penguin Random House for $15 billion, accusing the newspaper of being a “mouthpiece” for Democrats in the leadup to the 2024 election. He argued that the 2024 book Lucky Loser: How Donald Trump Squandered His Father’s Fortune and Created the Illusion of Success by Times investigative reporters Russ Buettner and Susanne Craig and three Times articles were part of a “decades-long pattern by the New York Times of intentional and malicious defamation” against him.

The filing was struck on Sept. 19 by District Judge Steven D. Merryday, who wrote that, “even assuming that after finally ‘melting’ the defendants’ alleged ‘iceberg of falsehoods’ the plaintiff prevails for each reason alleged in the complaint — even assuming all of that — a complaint remains an improper and impermissible place for the tedious and burdensome aggregation of prospective evidence, for the rehearsal of tendentious arguments.”

“A complaint is not a public forum for vituperation and invective — not a protected platform to rage against an adversary. A complaint is not a megaphone for public relations or a podium for a passionate oration at a political rally or the functional equivalent of the Hyde Park Speakers’ Corner,” Merryday continued.

Trump refiled an amended complaint on Oct. 19.

“The ‘Times’ has engaged in a decades long method of lying about your Favorite President (ME!), my family, business, the America First Movement, MAGA, and our Nation as a whole,” Trump posted on Truth Social in September. “I am PROUD to hold this once respected ‘rag’ responsible, as we are doing with the Fake News Networks such as our successful litigation against George Slopadopoulos/ABC/Disney, and 60 Minutes/CBS/Paramount, who knew that they were falsely ‘smearing’ me through a highly sophisticated system of document and visual alteration, which was, in effect, a malicious form of defamation, and thus, settled for record amounts.”

The Times has said that the lawsuit “has no merit.”

Trump also has an ongoing defamation lawsuit against the Des Moines Register over a 2024 election poll he claimed presented the contest between himself and Harris in Iowa as narrower than expected. A federal judge in Iowa dismissed a similar lawsuit from a subscriber to the newspaper this month, but Trump’s lawsuit will still be heard in an Iowa state court.

White House and Pentagon reporter restrictions

The White House and various executive departments have also instituted new restrictions aimed at regulating a “very disruptive” press, including requiring Defense journalists to only report on information that had been approved for release by War Secretary Pete Hegseth. Instead of agreeing to the rules, dozens of reporters chose to hand in their access badges and leave the Pentagon last month.

The Administration has also proposed new visa rules for foreign journalists, which would require visa-holders to renew their legal status every 240 days (or every 90 days for Chinese nationals) in order to continue working in the U.S.