Day: November 6, 2025

• Elizabeth Davis has sent over 500 applications since being laid off more than a year ago.
• Davis, 59, said she is concerned about ageism in the interview process because of her gray hair.
• She views her age as an advantage and doesn’t want to change her identity to get a job.

This as-told-to story is based on a conversation with Elizabeth Davis, a 59-year-old based outside D.C., who previously worked in communications. Her identity and application count have been verified by Business Insider. This story has been edited for length and clarity.

Just over a year ago, I was laid off from Broadcom. I did internal communications and employee engagement, and it was a total dream job.

I started looking for a role in October 2024, and I’ve come close a number of times. But most of the jobs have either been less than half of my previous salary, or the company decided to go with someone else.

The first interview always goes great. They say something like, “You’re exactly what we’re looking for,” and then it’s crickets.

I have submitted upwards of 500 applications to a range of jobs since starting my job hunt. I’m looking at manager positions, all the way down to roles that require five years of experience.

It’s always great when I get a phone call from a recruiter, but when it’s on a video, they can see I have gray hair — and I realize that may be hindering me. I think there’s a perception that if you’re older, you are technology-ignorant, and in this market you can’t be. They forget that if you want to learn something you can.

Based on my husband’s recent experience looking for a job, I knew it would be a tough road — and I soon realized that my gray hair might be perceived negatively.

A recruiter recently said to me, “Have you thought about coloring your hair?”

I tried to laugh it off, and I said, “Yes, I have thought about it.”

I don’t want to change my identity to get a job

I understand that it’s a tight market, especially now with the government shutdown and so much uncertainty — but I wish that people would suspend their own biases.

I live in an Orthodox Jewish community, and I have toyed with borrowing a friend’s wig. I could also just color my hair for this job search.

I normally keep my hair super short. That, and bright colored glasses, is sort of my trademark look. I run the risk of having to choose between being my authentic self and compromising my integrity.

I look at my age as a competitive advantage. I’ve earned this gray hair. I was just reading an article in “Scientific American” about how older workers have the cognitive ability to cut through the noise. We have more life experience, so we can see what’s urgent and distinguish between a real crisis and a manufactured crisis.

I don’t think anyone has the answers

I feel like in this environment, there’s no one answer. There’s nothing to say that even if I made my hair brown again, it would get me in the door.

I’ve had three different professional job coaches look at my résumé and give input — and each one gave me totally different counsel.

If you look at my résumé, I’ve eliminated positions prior to when I joined Boeing in June of 2000, but that’s already 25 years of experience right there.

One job coach told me I can take all the dates off and keep the most current position. I don’t know how I could get by with that. My résumé would be missing any narrative of how I launched into a role that clearly would have taken years to get to.

Another job coach said, “why don’t you chop the years of Boeing in half?” I left Boeing in 2016. I feel like if I only included half the years I worked there, it would come up if they did a reference check.

I’ve taken all the dates of my education off, and I’m happy to try leaving dates out completely. I’ve also considered restructuring it entirely to be a list of former employers, focusing solely on accomplishments.

But at the end of the day, it’s not really about coloring my hair. It’s that I’m proud of my gray hair. As I’m getting older, I refuse to just say, ‘I’m done.’ There’s still a lot of life left and a lot that can be contributed.

• TikTokers are packing “analog bags” as a way to curb doomscrolling.
• Their bags are packed with portable activities like books, crossword puzzles, and watercolors.
• People who participate in the trend say it’s part of a wider effort to use tech more intentionally.

Sierra Campbell has four key necessities she won’t leave home without: her phone, her keys, her wallet, and a small tote bag.

The first three she uses only for practicalities, like paying for things and looking up directions. The bag is the source of all her entertainment: Loaded with portable activities like crossword puzzles, knitting needles, and watercolor paints, it’s a deliberately screen-free way for Campbell to spend her in-between moments.

The 31-year-old has dubbed this her “analog bag,” and considers it a key weapon in her constant battle against doomscrolling and brain rot.

“I firmly believe you cannot live a full life while unknowingly addicted to your phone,” Campbell told me. “You might be missing really wonderful opportunities to have a fun and deep life. The analog piece is such a cornerstone of that.”

When Campbell introduced the analog bag concept to her TikTok followers in August, she said the video’s views and likes spiked well beyond her norm.

“It struck a nerve,” she said.

In the two months since, a flock of young women have followed her example, with many showing off their own versions of Campbell’s whimsical packing list: Disposable camera? Check. Needlepoint set? Check. Puzzle book? Check.

It may seem counterintuitive for a trend that celebrates screen-free life to resonate on TikTok, a platform that feeds on the exact habit these bags are fighting against. But all the women I spoke to for this piece said the appeal of the analog bag isn’t anti-technology or anti-social media. Rather, it’s part of a wider effort to use modern tools with care and intention — especially during the in-between moments of life, like when you’re taking the train to work or waiting for a friend at a restaurant.

Too often, these analog bag carriers say, we squander this time by ceding our attention to the algorithm.

“My parents would always say, ‘Count the cost,’ and they were never talking about money,” Campbell said. “The cost for the convenience of our phones has gotten too high.”

Analog bags are all about habit stacking

Emily Karst, a 32-year-old school principal in Ohio, saw Campbell’s video and instantly felt inspired. She, too, believes the key to using technology is moderation, and was looking for small ways to make that middle ground more attainable.

“What can I do to make it just as easy to pick up something that isn’t my phone?” she said. “Sometimes it’s because I want to check the time or I need to look at my directions or whatever. But more often, it’s because there’s been some sort of break in the action, and I’ve conditioned myself. I’m so uncomfortable being bored that I’m just going to instantly get that dopamine hit and watch a couple of TikToks real quick.”

“Instead, if there’s something else that we can grab,” she continued, “it allows us to make a better decision.”

Since she began carrying her own analog bag, which she loaded with a watercolor kit, “memory collecting” book, and needlepoint set, Karst sa the number of times she picks up her phone every day has plummeted.

“I’ve been so serious about this, mostly because I was alarming myself,” Karst said. “I don’t want to live my whole adult life losing my ability to engage with good art and long books and novels and movies because I’m ruining my attention.”

Campbell cites “The Power of Habit” by Charles Duhigg as a major inspiration for the concept of an analog bag. The popular self-help book, published in 2012, argues that replacing one habit with another is more effective than quitting cold turkey.

As someone with a self-described “addictive personality,” Campbell brings her analog bag everywhere because it ensures that phone alternatives are always within reach; the bag’s contents offer easy substitutes when she feels that instinctive itch to pick up her phone, like a cigarette smoker who’s trying to cut back might reach instead for a stick of gum.

Digital content is designed to be addictive, so Campbell’s precautions are carefully considered. She packs a physical planner in her analog bag so she doesn’t feel tempted to scroll if she needs to check her calendar. She even carries a Polaroid camera so she can interrogate whether she really needs a photo of something, or if it’s just going to be snapped and then lost in the cloud, never to be seen again.

“If it’s you versus your phone, the phone’s going to win,” Campbell said. “Willpower alone won’t work.”

Phone usage has become instinctive and detrimental to our health

Plenty of tech insiders and researchers have echoed Campbell’s observations. The psychological concept of “technostress” has been in the public lexicon since at least 2018. Tim Kendall, a former executive at Facebook and Pinterest, told Yahoo Finance in 2020 that phone overuse is a stealthy phenomenon, describing it as a serious health issue.

“Most people think they spend two hours a day on their phone,” Kendall said. “When we look at the data, it’s four and a half. So there’s a disconnect between reality and your awareness.”

Indeed, recent studies have found that heavy consumption of short-form media is bad for your brain — it’s linked to anxiety, depression, and shorter attention spans — and that even AI models can deteriorate when exposed to low-quality internet junk.

Still, the internet has become embedded in our daily routines and work lives. Being totally offline is a lofty and, for many, unappealing goal. Instead, those who carry analog bags or romanticize their #AnalogLife on TikTok simply strive to be mindful about their screen time — actively choosing when and why to engage with their devices, rather than scrolling mindlessly.

“We reach for our phones without really thinking first,” Hannah Hofstetter, a 23-year-old healthcare worker based in Alabama, told me. “A lot of times, it’s because we’re thinking we want to rest. We want it to give our brains a moment to rest. Well, that is the opposite of what’s happening.”

When Hofstetter first saw an analog bag on her feed, she said she was struck with sudden clarity. Why had she even picked up her phone in the first place? Why had she opened the TikTok app? She couldn’t remember the answers.

Now, when she’s out with friends and she feels a lull in the conversation, Hofstetter doesn’t reach for her phone — she reaches for her handy analog bag and pulls out a stack of Tarot cards.

“My first reaction was kind of an ‘aha’ moment,” Hofstetter said. “Like, wow, I’m not using my free will like I could be.”

• The partners said that strong relationship-building skills and a focus on details are key.
• One partner said that though AI is transforming work, the key skills she seeks remain the same.
• CEO David Solomon has said the bank will need to hire more “high-value” people with AI.

If you want to land a job at Goldman Sachs, consider honing your people skills.

Two partners at the bank told Business Insider how AI adoption is changing — or, in some cases, not changing — what they look for in applicants. As the cohead of Global Private Wealth Management and One Goldman Sachs, which is undergoing an AI-driven overhaul, Meena Lakdawala-Flynn said people skills are especially important.

“Strong judgment, strong interpersonal skills, creativity, curiosity, and of course a strong work ethic,” she said when asked what she looks for in potential hires.

Wealth management is, she said, about relationship building, and using AI tools effectively could free up more time to spend with clients.

“Those interpersonal skills are really important, because the more that you’re able to connect with your client and gain trust, the more that they open up to you,” Lakdawala-Flynn said. Her team often uses tools like the “GS AI Assistant,” the bank’s interactive AI sidekick, and a language translator, among others.

Asahi Pompey, global head of the Office of Corporate Engagement and chair of the Urban Investment Group, has been at Goldman for nearly 20 years and is herself a “big AI user.” Yet she doesn’t think the core skills that differentiate top applicants and employees have changed much, even as the technology transforms the workplace.

“The fundamentals are still the same,” Pompey said. “You want someone who lives in the details, who really understands the aspects of the work that they’re doing. You’re going to want somebody who’s going to be very responsive, because we move in a fast-paced way. Has a high level of accuracy.”

Knowing how to correctly prompt an AI chatbot and question its output are also key skills, she said.

Goldman has spent around $6 billion on technology this year, and CEO David Solomon has said the bank’s AI tools will “scale and transform our engineering abilities.” Junior employees are among the bank’s “AI natives,” Marco Argenti, Goldman’s chief information officer, said last month.

Though a recent internal memo about the AI updates to OneGS outlined “limited” job cuts at the firm, Solomon has said that the technology means Goldman will need to raise headcount and hire “high-value” employees.

Work at Goldman Sachs or have a tip? Contact this reporter via email at atecotzky@insider.com or Signal at alicetecotzky.05. Use a personal email address and a nonwork device; here’s our guide to sharing information securely.

• The future of the 35-year-old company behind the Roomba is uncertain.
• iRobot has warned that it is running out of options and cash.
• The company said it may be forced to fold or seek bankruptcy protection.

Roomba once reigned supreme in the world of robotic vacuums, conquering both dirty living room floors with its advanced tech and the marketplace it helped create.

But iRobot, the maker of the iconic self-cleaning disc-shaped vacuum, is now finding itself left in the dust as it teeters on the edge of bankruptcy. The Massachusetts-headquartered company, a pioneer in the robotics industry, has warned that it’s running out of options — and cash.

iRobot has grappled with mounting financial strain in recent years, and the collapse of Amazon’s planned $1.4 billion acquisition of the Roomba maker in early 2024 has only exacerbated the company’s troubles.

After months of trying to find a new buyer, iRobot said in a regulatory filing last month that its last remaining potential acquirer pulled out “following a lengthy period of exclusive negotiations.”

The possible iRobot buyer offered a price per share that was “significantly lower than the trading price” of its stock over recent months, the company said in the October 22 Securities and Exchange Commission filing.

The debt-burdened iRobot warned in the filing that if it can’t find fresh funding soon, it “may be forced to significantly curtail or cease operations and would likely seek bankruptcy protection.”

An iRobot spokesperson told Business Insider that, consistent with its policy, it does not comment “on matters of this nature beyond our public disclosures.”

With the holiday season approaching, the spokesperson said the company remains “focused on executing our strategy and delivering for our valued customers, partners, and consumers.”

iRobot first publicly warned investors that there was “substantial doubt” about its ability to continue “as a going concern” in a March earnings report.

That same month, the company rolled out a new fleet of Roomba vacuums and mops, which CEO Gary Cohen said was aimed at “better positioning iRobot as the leader in the category that we created.”

“There can be no assurance that the new product launches will be successful due to potential factors, including, but not limited to consumer demand, competition, macroeconomic conditions, and tariff policies,” the company said at the time.

iRobot’s current financial position marks a stunning fall for a company that introduced the world to the Roomba vacuum more than two decades ago and has sold over 50 million models globally since.

Founded by MIT roboticists

Before there was Optimus, Tesla’s humanoid robot, there was iRobot.

iRobot was founded in 1990 by three roboticists from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology — Colin Angle, Helen Greiner, and Rodney Brooks — who had a “vision of making practical robots a reality,” the company says on its website.

Before iRobot had its consumer breakthrough with the launch of the Roomba vacuum in 2002, the company focused on designing robots for space-related research and military use.

In 1998, iRobot won a contract from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, known as DARPA, to build a tactical mobile robot. This led to the development of iRobot’s PackBot, which was later used in search operations at Manhattan’s Ground Zero following the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

iRobot boasts on its website that its robots have “revealed mysteries of the Great Pyramid of Giza, found harmful subsea oil in the Gulf of Mexico, and saved thousands of lives in areas of conflict and crisis around the globe.”

When iRobot went public in November 2005 at an initial share price of $24, it was already known for its innovative robot vacuums.

By 2013, iRobot had sold over 10 million home cleaning robots, vastly outnumbering the more than 5,000 defense and security robots it had delivered to military and civil defense forces worldwide the year before.

The company sold its defense and security business to the private equity firm Arlington Capital Partners in 2016 for up to $45 million.

Over the past decade, iRobot’s annual revenue peaked in 2021 at $1.56 billion, but sales have been falling ever since.

iRobot — which today slings models ranging in price from $269.99 to as high as $1,299.99 — may have set the standard for home robot vacuums, but competition has surged from Chinese rivals like Dreame, Roborock, and Ecovacs, and other brands like Shark and Samsung.

In an August SEC filing, iRobot acknowledged that it has, in recent years, “seen increased competition with new product offerings in the robotic floorcare segment and have conceded some market share.”

The failed Amazon-iRobot deal

Amazon agreed to buy iRobot in 2022 for $61 per share in an all-cash transaction, but the deal fell apart two years later with the companies saying there was “no path to regulatory approval in the European Union.”

The failed deal was a major blow to iRobot. The same day the companies announced that the proposed merger was off, iRobot said it would lay off 350 employees, or about 31% of its workforce. Angle, iRobot’s cofounder and longtime CEO, also stepped down as part of the restructuring.

As the cash-strapped iRobot awaited the completion of the Amazon deal that never came, it took out a $200 million loan from the private equity firm Carlyle Group in July 2023.

iRobot said in last month’s regulatory filing that it had further extended its loan waiver period to December 1 as its financial outlook darkens.

“We are currently in discussions with the Lenders to provide the additional capital we require to fund our ongoing business operations,” iRobot wrote, adding that it may be forced to file for bankruptcy protection if the lenders “do not provide this necessary funding and we are unable to find other sources of capital in the near term.”

The iRobot spokesperson told Business Insider, “As disclosed in our Form 8-K filed with the SEC, we have reached an agreement with our primary lender to extend our covenant waiver under our loan agreement through December 1, 2025, in order to continue our active and ongoing review of strategic alternatives, including, but not limited to, exploring a potential sale or strategic transaction and refinancing our debt.”

Meanwhile, iRobot’s shares — priced at $2.70 as of Wednesday’s market close — have plunged about 65% year-to-date.