Day: October 25, 2025
MP for Manchester Central had been seen as favourite ahead of rival Bridget Phillipson throughout contest
• UK politics live – latest updates
Lucy Powell has won Labour’s deputy leadership election, beating her rival Bridget Phillipson.
Powell, who was the Commons leader until she was sacked in Keir Starmer’s reshuffle at the start of September, was seen as the favourite throughout the contest.
Jonathan Raa/NurPhoto
- Reddit has sued Perplexity and data scrapers, accusing them of illegally stealing its data.
- In the lawsuit, Reddit detailed a trap that it says Perplexity fell straight into.
- It was the digital equivalent of a “marked bill,” Reddit said in its lawsuit.
Employees at Reddit knew something was wrong.
Perplexity — the $20 billion artificial intelligence company that competes with OpenAI and Google — had agreed to follow Reddit’s instructions, blocking it from scraping content from the site, according to a lawsuit Reddit filed Wednesday.
But, the lawsuit said, Perplexity continued to cite Reddit in its AI-generated answers — more than ever. The CEO of another AI company even speculated that Perplexity and Reddit secretly struck a content licensing deal.
“The increase was so dramatic that an outside observer hypothesized that the increase was due to Perplexity entering a licensing deal with Reddit and thereby obtaining full access to Reddit’s data,” Reddit’s lawsuit said.
“In truth, there is no license between Perplexity and Reddit,” the lawsuit said, adding that it was the result of “a scheme by Perplexity to obtain Reddit’s data through the circumvention of the technological measures protecting Reddit data.”
So Reddit set a trap. The company created a test post that could only be crawled by Google’s search engine, according to the lawsuit. While Google has a content-licensing deal with Reddit, Perplexity does not.
It was the digital equivalent of a “marked bill,” Reddit’s lawsuit said. According to the lawsuit, the only way Perplexity would be able to get the data in the test post is if it bypassed Reddit’s guardrails using Google’s search engine page results, or SERPS.
If the content from the post was ingested by Perplexity through Google, Reddit would know, according to the lawsuit.
A few hours after it set the trap, Reddit got its answer.
“Within hours, queries to Perplexity’s ‘answer engine’ produced the contents of that test post,” the lawsuit says. “The only way that Perplexity could have obtained that Reddit content and then used it in its ‘answer engine’ is if it and/or its Co-Defendants scraped Google SERPs for that Reddit content and Perplexity then quickly incorporated that data.”
Reddit described the test in its lawsuit, filed Wednesday in Manhattan federal court, against Perplexity and three data-scraping companies: Oxylabs UAB, AWM Proxy, and SerpApi. Reddit alleged the data-scraping companies may have taken its posts without permission and sold them to Perplexity.
Perplexity spokesperson Jesse Dwyer told Business Insider in response to the lawsuit that the company “will not tolerate threats against openness and the public interest.”
Perplexity said in a Reddit post after the lawsuit was filed that it “does not train AI models on content.”
A representative for SerpApi said the company plans to “vigorously defend ourselves in court, while Oxylabs’ chief governance and strategy officer, Denas Grybauskas, said the company was “shocked and disappointed.”
“Oxylabs has always been and will continue to be a pioneer and an industry leader in public data collection, and it will not hesitate to defend itself against these allegations,” Grybauskas said.
AWMProxy, identified in Reddit’s lawsuit as a former Russian botnet, could not be reached for comment.
Reddit’s trap resembles one set up by internet infrastructure company Cloudflare. In an August blog post, the company said it set up web pages with code that instructed Perplexity not to crawl those sites’ content. It found that Perplexity’s crawlers went to those websites anyway.
Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince compared Perplexity to “North Korean hackers” for the behavior. Reddit cited the characterization in its lawsuit.
“Some supposedly ‘reputable’ AI companies act more like North Korean hackers,” Matthew Prince wrote on X in August. “Time to name, shame, and hard block them.”
Cloudflare did not respond to a request for comment.
Alex Bitter/BI
- Whole Foods is opening more small-format Daily Shop stores.
- Business Insider visited the newest location, which opened on Thursday in Arlington, Virginia.
- The store seemed to fix one issue that faced Whole Foods’ last small-store attempt.
Whole Foods is getting in on the small grocery store trend.
On Thursday, the Amazon-owned chain expanded its Whole Foods Market Daily Shop concept with the first location outside New York City. The store is located across the Potomac River from Washington, DC, in Arlington, Virginia — right around the corner from Amazon’s HQ2.
At about 10,000 square feet, this Daily Shop location is about a quarter of the size of a normal Whole Foods store. And, as the name implies, Amazon’s goal isn’t really to offer the store’s patrons everything they might need for their weekly grocery haul.
“If you want a quick lunch, need some ingredients on your way home from work, or you’re stopping in for a meal to go ahead of a flight, we’re ready to serve you,” store team leader Jose Gomez said in a statement about Thursday’s opening.
A Whole Foods spokesperson said that Daily Shop offers a similar product selection to regular Whole Foods stores, “but you won’t see things like a hot bar or full-service meat and seafood cases that you’d see in our traditional, larger store formats.”
“Each category will have a smaller selection, but every category is still represented with various options and price points for the customer,” the spokesperson said.
The Daily Shop format is designed for dense urban areas, Amazon said when it introduced the concept last year. Other smaller-format supermarkets, such as Aldi and Grocery Outlet, have been expanding rapidly in the US.
I headed to the latest Daily Shop location on opening day to see what shopping there is like. Here’s what I found.
Joe Raedle/Getty Images
- The US job market is in a “Great Freeze” due to a slew of factors.
- Companies don’t want to let talent go, but they’re not adding head count.
- Low layoffs at a time of low hiring can hinder professional advancement.
Bundle up and hunker down. The low-fire, low-hire job market can be summed up in one phrase: the “Great Freeze.”
There are a lot of “lows” in the soft job market, including layoffs and unemployment. That’s the good news and has been the story for over a year. However, the not-so-good news is that job openings and hires have also dropped.
The lack of hiring and the lack of firing could have the same causes. Economists told Business Insider that the US hasn’t had large-scale layoffs because even though the economy is still strong, uncertainties around tariffs and other issues mean that companies are hanging on to the talent they have while being reluctant to hire more.
The low-fire, low-hire labor market has its pros and cons, including hindering potential career growth for workers but offering cost-saving measures for companies.
ZipRecruiter called the recent labor market “The Great Freeze” in a new report on recent turnover and hiring outlook.
“We’re seeing employers and job seekers both trying to wait out any of the uncertainty,” Nicole Bachaud, labor economist at ZipRecruiter, told Business Insider.
The lockup between low layoffs and low hiring might not end any time soon.
“We’re only a few months until the end of the year, and there isn’t an immediately obvious catalyst for why the job market would snap out of the malaise that it’s in,” Daniel Zhao, the chief economist at Glassdoor, said.
Why companies aren’t laying people off or hiring extensively
Jason Draho, the head of asset allocation Americas for UBS Global Wealth Management, said growth and consumer spending remain relatively solid, making it hard to justify large-scale layoffs.
“Earnings are still positive, businesses are still making money, and there’s not really a catalyst for them to reevaluate their head count,” said Stephen Juneau, a senior US economist at Bank of America.
Juneau said that uncertainty, artificial intelligence, pockets of economic weakness — such as in construction activity — and supply issues are affecting companies investing in new talent.
There are likely fewer workers entering the US these days, slowing labor force growth. “This negative labor supply shock obviously contributes to a slowdown in hiring,” Juneau said.
Supply issues combined with low hiring have also affected unemployment, which has risen but remains relatively low, Draho said.
Zhao said that employers are labor hoarding, or holding on to talent as a precaution, because they don’t want to relive previous staffing troubles. “After the experience during the Great Resignation and the labor shortages era, many businesses are hesitant to return to a world where they are desperate for workers and can’t find them,” he said.
Draho said that if next year has better growth, stimulus measures, and tariff clarity, then companies won’t want to be making mass layoffs now and then have to scramble for employees. “They don’t want to be caught short with a lack of labor,” he said.
ZipRecruiter’s September survey of talent acquisition professionals showed 63% of businesses intend to hire moderately or significantly more in the next year, down from 76% last year. “However, the current macroeconomic conditions are continuing to add delays and additional layers that are going to continue to keep hiring and movement in general at this slower pace for the next couple of months,” Bachaud said.
But labor hoarding could crumble if the economy worsens. “If employers have some cash or some buffer to work with, they can afford to keep some workers on staff, even if it isn’t profitable right now,” Zhao said. “I don’t expect this labor hoarding story to be able to protect against a full business cycle and recession where businesses are going to be forced to lay off workers.”
What today’s job market means for workers, job seekers, and employers
Zhao said labor hoarding can be good for workers because of job security, and unemployed people have less competition than if there were mass layoffs. However, many people are still actively seeking employment in the low-hiring, low-layoff environment. So, it can be tough to land a job. There were 7.4 million people unemployed in August, but only 7.2 million job openings were available; the number of job openings per unemployed person has cooled way down since the tight labor market recovery after the pandemic recession.
“Many workers have to settle for jobs that are not a good fit for them, whether they don’t pay commensurate with their experience or it’s not in a field or industry that they’re skills would best match,” Zhao said.
Lack of turnover can hinder professional development. Zhao said that low hiring affects jobholders who may want to secure a new job that offers better career growth opportunities or who wish to advance or negotiate a raise internally. The Atlanta Fed’s Wage Growth Tracker showed the 12-month moving averages of median wage growth were similar for job switchers and job stayers as of August.
“Employers who are focusing too much on stability and keeping everything as it is, keeping the status quo, are going to risk losing out to innovation and growth that’s not going to be happening if there’s no movement internally in their company,” Bachaud said. “Employees are going to be stuck in their role without growing and adding new skills and moving along their career paths.”
In the cool job market with workers staying put, Bachaud suggested people upskill within their roles so they can still grow and add to their résumé when they look for a new position.
Are you job searching, staying put in your job, or a hiring manager who has seen the workplace change? Reach out to this reporter to share at mhoff@businessinsider.com.
Children across the UK have been shouting out ‘six-seven’ during lessons, so how are teachers reacting?
Across the UK, school pupils have been shouting out the words “sixseven” during lessons in the latest meme-based craze to sweep across classrooms.
While some teachers have chosen to stoically ignore the trend, others have embraced it. Five teachers explain how they’re coping.
