Month: September 2025
Courtesy of Brian Straughter
- Dropping my son off at college reopened the grief I had been carrying since his brother’s death.
- After many years of pushing my grief aside, I finally allowed myself to sit with it.
- Now I’ve grown closer to both my sons and embraced all the ways I stay connected to them both.
When I dropped my son off at college for his freshman year, I was plagued with questions: Will he make friends? Will he get his homework in on time? Will he get caught texting during class?
I was then forced to return home to the proverbial empty nest. The adjustment quickly became a complicated mix of sadness and excitement, anxiety and pride, and that feeling in my gut that things will never be quite the same.
But my empty nest triggered something bigger in me. Bringing my 18-year-old, Ethan, to college opened a Pandora’s box I didn’t even know I was carrying.
It was a box I’d been holding on to since my other son, Jake, died 13 years before.
I struggled to adapt to my new empty nest
While Ethan was acclimating to being a freshman, I was back home grappling with a host of feelings that were new, and yet eerily familiar.
I cried every time I walked past Ethan’s bedroom and saw it clean and neat — a sure sign that he was no longer living with us. I made huge dinners for my husband and me since I wasn’t sure how to cook for just the two of us. I still bought all of Ethan’s favorite snacks only to have them remain unopened.
I just missed him. At times, I found myself struggling to breathe.
My feelings of grief returned
I was also sometimes unable to differentiate between Ethan’s departure and Jake’s death. My logical brain knew they were different, but my heart didn’t. Eventually, all these feelings rose to the surface and burst open my Pandora’s box, leaving shards everywhere. I found slivers everywhere for months after.
Ironically, I’d always prided myself on being very attuned to my grief about Jake. I often visited his graveside, refreshing his flowers and bringing him trinkets from our travels. I brought him balloons and other silly things on his birthdays. I even started a foundation in his memory to give me an outlet to talk about him. But when Ethan went to school and I felt that void both in my house and in my heart, I realized that I never really dealt with the loss of Jake.
When he first died, I cried until I was raw for weeks, but eventually those tears dried up, and life continued. I thought that was the process: I grieved, and then I was done.
But once Ethan left, the pain came back, and it was worse than I remembered. It took me some time to connect that the pain was related to Jake’s death. Slowly, I became reacquainted with my grief, and I let myself spend the time with it that I hadn’t before. I began to understand that grief isn’t linear. It’s more like a pinball bouncing around for the remainder of your time on earth.
Oddly enough, this big grief epiphany came to me on the 13th anniversary of Jake’s death, and I dealt with it by writing him a letter. This is part of what I wrote:
“Getting used to the house without your brother nearly broke me. I couldn’t help but compare it to your leaving. It is not something you can tell people because A) no one understands, and B) it is weird and not really at all the same. The thing is that it felt the same to me. I existed with this crazy hole in my heart and had to train myself to realize it was different.”
I’m learning to live with grief and joy
Grief isn’t always negative and dark, or at least it doesn’t have to be. Dark days exist, but for me, the sadness makes me love harder and appreciate life more than ever before.
This new version of me is empowered by my grief, almost like it’s my superpower. I’m no longer self-conscious about talking out loud to Jake. While I know it’s just a name, I feel a deep-rooted sense of joy and comfort when I meet other “Jakes.”
Losing Jake remains a huge part of who I am. I just brought Ethan to school for his junior year, and Pandora’s box is no longer with me. Instead, it’s a gift that allows me to remain connected to both of my boys and feel secure that our relationships can and will continue to evolve. And for that, I’m eternally grateful.
The hypothesis: Kirk’s killing might have been the Mossad operation – Google Search google.com/search?q=The+hypo…
Initial police investigations and news reports do not support the hypothesis that Israeli intelligence agency Mossad was involved in the killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk on September 10, 2025. The hypothesis originated from social media posts and has not been confirmed by law enforcement. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Official investigation and findings• Arrest of Tyler Robinson: Utah authorities arrested 22-year-old Tyler Robinson in connection with Kirk’s killing on September 12, 2025.
• Confession and evidence: Robinson allegedly confessed to his father, who then contacted authorities. Law enforcement also recovered the bolt-action rifle believed to be the murder weapon, along with engraved casings, and were able to match the suspect’s vehicle to surveillance footage.
• Suspect’s potential motive: While no official motive has been announced, reports indicate Robinson had a recent interest in politics and held anti-Kirk viewpoints. One of the engraved shell casings included a reference to fascism and internet memes.
• No link to foreign intelligence: As of September 14, 2025, there has been no credible evidence presented by investigators to connect the suspect or the motive to Mossad or any other foreign state. [4, 5, 6, 7, 8]Conspiracy theories on social media
• Mossad allegations: Following the attack, some social media users promoted the unfounded theory that Mossad was behind the killing.
• Motivation for the claims: The speculation was fueled by Kirk’s vocal support for Israel and the timing of the assassination, which occurred one day after an Israeli airstrike in Doha. Some conspiracy theorists suggested the killing was intended to distract from Israel’s actions.
• Counter-arguments and criticism: Fact-checkers and observers have noted the baseless nature of these claims, highlighting that Kirk was a firm ally of Israel and that a Mossad-led assassination would be illogical . Forbes specifically cited a user on X spreading the Mossad conspiracy, noting the broader trend of misinformation surrounding the event
.Conclusion
The hypothesis that Mossad was responsible for Kirk’s killing is a conspiracy theory circulated on social media. It is not supported by the evidence gathered by law enforcement, which has led to the arrest of a U.S. resident, Tyler Robinson, as the sole suspect. [3, 4, 6]AI responses may include mistakes.
[1] forbes.com/sites/emmawoollac…] youtube.com/watch?v=JbKDsIwt…] instagram.com/p/DOdiiCRETNb/…] cbsnews.com/news/charlie-kir…] theguardian.com/us-news/2025…] nbcnews.com/news/us-news/liv…] bbc.com/news/articles/cly741…] aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/…] aljazeera.com/news/2025/9/11…
— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Sep 14, 2025
China Launches Investigations into U.S. Semiconductor Exports Ahead of Madrid Trade Talks
China has initiated two investigations targeting the U.S. semiconductor sector in response to recent export restrictions, as high-level trade negotiations in Madrid loom, reports 24brussels.
The Ministry of Commerce disclosed an anti-dumping investigation into certain analog integrated circuits (ICs) imported from the U.S., specifically examining commodity interface IC chips and gate driver IC chips, commonly produced by companies such as Texas Instruments and ON Semiconductor. Simultaneously, the ministry has launched an anti-discrimination investigation concerning U.S. measures affecting China’s domestic chip industry.
A ministry spokesperson criticized U.S. export restrictions and tariffs as attempts to “contain and suppress China’s development of high-tech industries,” particularly advanced semiconductors and artificial intelligence technologies. These latest actions come on the heels of the U.S. adding 23 Chinese companies to an “entity list” for allegedly undermining U.S. national security and foreign policy, which includes firms accused of acquiring chipmaking equipment for China’s SMIC.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is slated to meet Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng in Madrid from Sunday to Wednesday. These discussions aim to reduce trade tensions and postpone the application of higher tariffs, continuing negotiations that began with meetings in Geneva in May, London in June, and Stockholm in July.
Reflecting on the Stockholm discussions, Bessent termed them “very fulsome,” emphasizing the importance of “de-risking with certain strategic industries,” including rare earths, semiconductors, and medicines. He underscored the need for balance within the bilateral relationship.
Both the Trump and Biden administrations have enforced restrictions on China’s access to advanced semiconductors, implementing curbs on the sale of chipmaking equipment. While Washington presents these measures as national security safeguards, Beijing views them as part of a broader U.S. strategy to hinder China’s technological progress.
As tensions escalate, the global implications for technology and supply chains remain significant, underscoring the complexities of international trade in a rapidly evolving geopolitical landscape.
Source: AP
