How To Train Your Dragon 2 will bring Hiccup’s mom, Valka, into the story, and there are many actresses who could be cast in the pivotal role.
Month: September 2025
#Putin #War #CIA
Putin’s Brinkmanship: War with West g.co/gemini/share/89f83df67c…
Putin’s High-Stakes Gamble: The Art of Brinkmanship in His Confrontation with the WestMoscow, Russia – In what can be described as a generation-defining geopolitical struggle, Russian President Vladimir Putin is engaged in a high-stakes “big war” with the West, not necessarily of open, direct conflict, but one of relentless pressure, calculated escalation, and the masterful use of brinkmanship. His overarching goal is audacious: to dismantle the U.S.-led global order and carve out a new multipolar world where Russia reclaims its status as a primary global power.1 The war in Ukraine serves as the most visible and brutal front of this broader conflict, but the tactics of brinkmanship are deployed across a spectrum of domains, from nuclear posturing to the weaponization of energy and information.
At the heart of Putin’s strategy lies a profound belief that the post-Cold War settlement was a historical injustice that relegated Russia to a subordinate position.2 His actions are driven by a desire to revise this outcome, pushing back against what he perceives as Western encroachment in Russia’s traditional spheres of influence and challenging the very foundations of the international security architecture.3
The Calculated Madness: Putin’s Brand of Brinkmanship
Brinkmanship, the art of pursuing a dangerous policy to the limits of safety before stopping, is a cornerstone of Putin’s foreign policy. It is a calculated strategy designed to sow division, test the resolve of his adversaries, and force concessions without triggering a full-scale, direct military confrontation with NATO.4 Key elements of his approach include:
Nuclear Saber-Rattling: The most potent and dangerous tool in Putin’s arsenal is the repeated and often veiled threat of using nuclear weapons.5 From placing nuclear forces on high alert at the outset of the Ukraine invasion to ambiguous statements about defending Russian territory with “all available means,” these pronouncements are designed to instill fear and deter greater Western involvement in the conflict.6 While the actual use of such weapons remains a low probability, the mere suggestion serves to paralyze Western decision-making and create a constant sense of anxiety.
“Gray Zone” Warfare: Putin has demonstrated a mastery of operating in the ambiguous space between peace and war. This includes a range of hostile activities that fall below the threshold of a conventional military attack, such as cyberattacks on critical infrastructure, disinformation campaigns to sow social and political discord, and provocative military maneuvers.7 Recent examples include repeated drone incursions and violations of NATO airspace, meticulously calibrated to test response times and sow doubt about the alliance’s collective security commitments without triggering an immediate armed response.8
Weaponization of Resources: Russia has long used its vast energy reserves as a tool of coercion.9 By manipulating the flow of natural gas and oil, Moscow has sought to create economic pressure on European nations, hoping to fracture their unity and undermine their support for Ukraine. While this leverage has diminished as Europe diversifies its energy sources, it remains a potent symbol of Russia’s willingness to use all instruments of national power in its confrontation with the West.
The “Red Line” Gambit: Throughout the Ukraine conflict, the Kremlin has repeatedly issued “red lines” – actions by the West that it claims would provoke a severe Russian response.10 These have included the provision of certain types of advanced weaponry to Ukraine and direct NATO intervention. However, as the West has cautiously and incrementally crossed many of these self-declared lines without triggering a catastrophic escalation, the credibility of these threats has been tested. This tactic, while potentially risky, allows Putin to control the narrative of escalation and portray any Western assistance to Ukraine as a provocative act.
The Endgame: A New World Order
Putin’s brinkmanship is not an end in itself but a means to a much larger strategic objective. He envisions a world where the unipolar moment of American dominance is over, replaced by a system where major powers like Russia, China, and others have their own spheres of influence and a greater say in global affairs.11
By challenging the existing order through a sustained campaign of pressure and calculated risks, Putin aims to demonstrate the West’s perceived weakness and lack of resolve.12 He seeks to expose the fissures within NATO and the European Union, betting that over time, the economic and social costs of confronting Russia will lead to a fracturing of the Western coalition.13
The effectiveness and ultimate outcome of this high-stakes gamble remain uncertain. While Putin’s tactics have at times appeared to yield short-term gains, they have also led to Russia’s increased international isolation, severe economic sanctions, and a revitalized and more unified NATO.14 The “big war” with the West is a protracted struggle, and the art of brinkmanship, as practiced by Vladimir Putin, will continue to define the perilous landscape of 21st-century geopolitics.
–
Putin’s Brinkmanship: War with West – GS
google.com/search?q=Putin%27…
AI Overview
Vladimir Putin’s brinkmanship has escalated tensions with the West throughout 2025, but it has not resulted in an all-out war. Instead, Russia’s actions are part of a broader “hybrid war” strategy involving military provocations, nuclear saber-rattling, arms control maneuvering, and disinformation campaigns designed to test NATO’s resolve and exploit internal divisions. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Military provocations and hybrid tactics Recent provocations have been met with a strong, coordinated response from NATO, which remains a key factor in preventing a wider conflict.• Airspace violations: In September 2025, Russia deliberately flew drones into the airspace of NATO members Poland and Denmark. Analysts viewed these incursions as tests of NATO’s reaction.
• NATO response: Following the violations, NATO allies, backed by U.S. President Trump, issued a strong warning to the Kremlin that future incursions could result in Russian aircraft being shot down. NATO also launched “Eastern Sentry,” a multi-domain mission to increase air defense along its eastern flank.
• Shadow war: Russia’s ongoing hybrid war against NATO includes cyberattacks, disinformation, and sabotage. The European Council on Foreign Relations notes that Russia’s use of cheaper drones to probe NATO’s expensive air defenses is a way to gain an advantage and exhaust its opponents.
• Zapad-2025 exercises: Joint Russian-Belarusian military exercises were conducted in September 2025. While some initial fears of nuclear saber-rattling did not materialize, the exercises still involved simulated large-scale military aggression against NATO forces. [4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14]Nuclear signaling and arms control Russia continues to use nuclear posturing to intimidate the West while simultaneously maneuvering for arms control negotiations to gain concessions.
• Temporary arms control extension: In September 2025, Putin offered to abide by the limits of the New START nuclear treaty for one year after its February 2026 expiration, provided the U.S. does the same. Analysts viewed this as an attempt to compel the Trump administration into broader talks for Russia’s benefit.
• Increased nuclear brinkmanship: In May 2024, Putin ordered exercises for tactical nuclear weapons. The Brookings Institution viewed this as a new phase of brinkmanship that demands an upgraded Western deterrence posture
. The American Enterprise Institute also noted in August 2023 that the Ukraine war is the start of a “new era of nuclear brinkmanship” involving Russia and other major powers.Justification for aggression and disinformation Since 2022, Putin has worked to shape the information environment to justify the invasion and destabilize Western countries.
• Blaming the West: In September 2025, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov claimed Moscow was in a “real war” with NATO and the EU, repeating the Kremlin’s long-standing narrative that the West provoked the conflict.
• Targeting Western values: Putin frames Russia as an upholder of “traditional values,” demonizing the West’s more liberal social views. This is designed to appeal to populist movements in Europe and the U.S. and drive internal division. [5, 20, 21, 22]Risks of miscalculation Several analysts have pointed out the increased danger of miscalculation and accidental escalation.
• Trump’s unpredictability: Some experts, including analysts at the European Council on Foreign Relations and CNN, cite the unpredictable nature of U.S. President Donald Trump’s potential reactions as a significant risk factor for miscalculation.
• Escalation ladder: The possibility of Article 4 consultations—emergency discussions within NATO—has increased in 2025, reminding observers of the alliance’s Article 5 mutual defense clause. While invoking Article 5 is a major step, the current tensions raise the risk of triggering the alliance’s collective defense mechanisms. [11, 23, 25, 26, 27]AI responses may include mistakes.
[1] europeanleadershipnetwork.or…
[2] bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
[3] understandingwar.org/researc…
[4] nato-pa.int/document/2025-01…
[5] politico.com/news/2025/09/25…
[6] foxnews.com/politics/putin-p…
[7] nato.int/cps/en/natohq/offic…
[8] youtube.com/watch?v=A6f8qHLd…
[9] newsweek.com/russia-ukraine-…
[10] newsweek.com/russia-nato-lav…
[11] ecfr.eu/article/flaunting-mi…
[12] understandingwar.org/researc…
[13] reuters.com/business/aerospa…
[14] ecfr.eu/article/flaunting-mi…
[15] atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/uk…
[16] aei.org/op-eds/welcome-to-th…
[17] brookings.edu/articles/nucle…
[18] latimes.com/world-nation/sto…
[19] graphicnews.com/en/pages/473…
[20] understandingwar.org/researc…
[21] brookings.edu/articles/how-t…
[22] cqpress.sagepub.com/cqresear…
[23] usnews.com/news/u-s-news-dec…
[24] cnn.com/2025/09/27/europe/pu…
[25] cnn.com/2025/09/27/europe/pu…
[26] russiamatters.org/news/russi…
[27] facebook.com/groups/51935517…
–
Putin’s Brinkmanship: War with the WestRecent analysis indicates that while Russian President Vladimir Putin’s brinkmanship tactics have escalated tensions, particularly through the use of nuclear threats and hybrid warfare, Russia has neither the capability nor the appetite for direct conventional military conflict with NATO. These actions are designed to weaken Western support for Ukraine, test alliance resolve, and interfere in rivals’ domestic politics. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
The elements of brinkmanship Nuclear threatsSince the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, Russia has repeatedly engaged in nuclear saber-rattling to deter the West from increasing support for Ukraine.• This has included placing nuclear forces on high alert, deploying tactical nuclear weapons to Belarus, and testing new capabilities.
• Some experts argue this is largely a bluff, as a nuclear attack against a NATO state would likely result in a retaliatory nuclear strike.
• However, Western powers still take these threats seriously and plan for potential escalations. [3, 6, 8, 9, 10]Hybrid warfareRussia has intensified its use of hybrid warfare tactics to destabilize the West without triggering a direct war. Recent examples include:
• Airspace incursions: In September 2025, Russia flew drones into Polish and Romanian airspace and sent fighter jets into Estonian airspace over the Baltic Sea. These were perceived as tests of NATO’s air defenses and resolve.
• Sabotage: In March 2025, a report documented numerous Russian sabotage attacks against Western infrastructure, including transportation, government, and critical infrastructure targets.
• Disinformation and propaganda: Russia continues to wage disinformation campaigns to sow division within the West, frame Russia as a victim, and garner support from populist and anti-establishment groups.
• Cyberattacks: Russia has long used cyberattacks to disrupt Western governments and infrastructure. [2, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]Exploiting Western divisionsA key part of Putin’s strategy is to exploit existing disagreements and political shifts within the West.
• US elections: Russia’s hybrid warfare and nuclear threats are amplified to test the incoming US administration and exploit uncertainty regarding American commitment to European security.
• European cohesion: Russia attempts to create daylight between the US and its European allies and stoke anti-war sentiments, as seen with the recent airspace incursions over Poland and Romania. [3, 17, 18, 19, 20]Why a conventional war with NATO is unlikely Experts generally agree that despite the rhetoric and provocations, Russia is not seeking a direct conventional war with NATO.
• NATO’s strength: NATO’s conventional military capability far outmatches Russia’s, especially given the significant losses sustained in the ongoing war against Ukraine.
• Nuclear parity: While Russia holds an advantage in tactical nuclear weapons, both Russia and the US maintain strategic parity under arms control agreements (including the recently extended New START treaty), meaning a nuclear conflict would lead to Mutually Assured Destruction.
• Diversionary tactics: The brinkmanship serves to distract from Russia’s struggles in Ukraine, project strength, and force the West to over-prioritize defensive measures. [1, 3, 8, 21, 22]
–— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Sep 27, 2025
Silver-spoon socialist Zohran Mamdani is longtime Airbnb opponent, yet the NYC mayoral frontrunner’s filthy rich parents have been listing their ritzy, secluded Ugandan compound on the short-term rental site the past eight years, The Post has learned.
#Putin #War #CIA
Putin’s Brinkmanship: War with West g.co/gemini/share/89f83df67c…
Putin’s High-Stakes Gamble: The Art of Brinkmanship in His Confrontation with the WestMoscow, Russia – In what can be described as a generation-defining geopolitical struggle, Russian President Vladimir Putin is engaged in a high-stakes “big war” with the West, not necessarily of open, direct conflict, but one of relentless pressure, calculated escalation, and the masterful use of brinkmanship. His overarching goal is audacious: to dismantle the U.S.-led global order and carve out a new multipolar world where Russia reclaims its status as a primary global power.1 The war in Ukraine serves as the most visible and brutal front of this broader conflict, but the tactics of brinkmanship are deployed across a spectrum of domains, from nuclear posturing to the weaponization of energy and information.
At the heart of Putin’s strategy lies a profound belief that the post-Cold War settlement was a historical injustice that relegated Russia to a subordinate position.2 His actions are driven by a desire to revise this outcome, pushing back against what he perceives as Western encroachment in Russia’s traditional spheres of influence and challenging the very foundations of the international security architecture.3
The Calculated Madness: Putin’s Brand of Brinkmanship
Brinkmanship, the art of pursuing a dangerous policy to the limits of safety before stopping, is a cornerstone of Putin’s foreign policy. It is a calculated strategy designed to sow division, test the resolve of his adversaries, and force concessions without triggering a full-scale, direct military confrontation with NATO.4 Key elements of his approach include:
Nuclear Saber-Rattling: The most potent and dangerous tool in Putin’s arsenal is the repeated and often veiled threat of using nuclear weapons.5 From placing nuclear forces on high alert at the outset of the Ukraine invasion to ambiguous statements about defending Russian territory with “all available means,” these pronouncements are designed to instill fear and deter greater Western involvement in the conflict.6 While the actual use of such weapons remains a low probability, the mere suggestion serves to paralyze Western decision-making and create a constant sense of anxiety.
“Gray Zone” Warfare: Putin has demonstrated a mastery of operating in the ambiguous space between peace and war. This includes a range of hostile activities that fall below the threshold of a conventional military attack, such as cyberattacks on critical infrastructure, disinformation campaigns to sow social and political discord, and provocative military maneuvers.7 Recent examples include repeated drone incursions and violations of NATO airspace, meticulously calibrated to test response times and sow doubt about the alliance’s collective security commitments without triggering an immediate armed response.8
Weaponization of Resources: Russia has long used its vast energy reserves as a tool of coercion.9 By manipulating the flow of natural gas and oil, Moscow has sought to create economic pressure on European nations, hoping to fracture their unity and undermine their support for Ukraine. While this leverage has diminished as Europe diversifies its energy sources, it remains a potent symbol of Russia’s willingness to use all instruments of national power in its confrontation with the West.
The “Red Line” Gambit: Throughout the Ukraine conflict, the Kremlin has repeatedly issued “red lines” – actions by the West that it claims would provoke a severe Russian response.10 These have included the provision of certain types of advanced weaponry to Ukraine and direct NATO intervention. However, as the West has cautiously and incrementally crossed many of these self-declared lines without triggering a catastrophic escalation, the credibility of these threats has been tested. This tactic, while potentially risky, allows Putin to control the narrative of escalation and portray any Western assistance to Ukraine as a provocative act.
The Endgame: A New World Order
Putin’s brinkmanship is not an end in itself but a means to a much larger strategic objective. He envisions a world where the unipolar moment of American dominance is over, replaced by a system where major powers like Russia, China, and others have their own spheres of influence and a greater say in global affairs.11
By challenging the existing order through a sustained campaign of pressure and calculated risks, Putin aims to demonstrate the West’s perceived weakness and lack of resolve.12 He seeks to expose the fissures within NATO and the European Union, betting that over time, the economic and social costs of confronting Russia will lead to a fracturing of the Western coalition.13
The effectiveness and ultimate outcome of this high-stakes gamble remain uncertain. While Putin’s tactics have at times appeared to yield short-term gains, they have also led to Russia’s increased international isolation, severe economic sanctions, and a revitalized and more unified NATO.14 The “big war” with the West is a protracted struggle, and the art of brinkmanship, as practiced by Vladimir Putin, will continue to define the perilous landscape of 21st-century geopolitics.
–
Putin’s Brinkmanship: War with West – GS
google.com/search?q=Putin%27…
AI Overview
Vladimir Putin’s brinkmanship has escalated tensions with the West throughout 2025, but it has not resulted in an all-out war. Instead, Russia’s actions are part of a broader “hybrid war” strategy involving military provocations, nuclear saber-rattling, arms control maneuvering, and disinformation campaigns designed to test NATO’s resolve and exploit internal divisions. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Military provocations and hybrid tactics Recent provocations have been met with a strong, coordinated response from NATO, which remains a key factor in preventing a wider conflict.• Airspace violations: In September 2025, Russia deliberately flew drones into the airspace of NATO members Poland and Denmark. Analysts viewed these incursions as tests of NATO’s reaction.
• NATO response: Following the violations, NATO allies, backed by U.S. President Trump, issued a strong warning to the Kremlin that future incursions could result in Russian aircraft being shot down. NATO also launched “Eastern Sentry,” a multi-domain mission to increase air defense along its eastern flank.
• Shadow war: Russia’s ongoing hybrid war against NATO includes cyberattacks, disinformation, and sabotage. The European Council on Foreign Relations notes that Russia’s use of cheaper drones to probe NATO’s expensive air defenses is a way to gain an advantage and exhaust its opponents.
• Zapad-2025 exercises: Joint Russian-Belarusian military exercises were conducted in September 2025. While some initial fears of nuclear saber-rattling did not materialize, the exercises still involved simulated large-scale military aggression against NATO forces. [4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14]Nuclear signaling and arms control Russia continues to use nuclear posturing to intimidate the West while simultaneously maneuvering for arms control negotiations to gain concessions.
• Temporary arms control extension: In September 2025, Putin offered to abide by the limits of the New START nuclear treaty for one year after its February 2026 expiration, provided the U.S. does the same. Analysts viewed this as an attempt to compel the Trump administration into broader talks for Russia’s benefit.
• Increased nuclear brinkmanship: In May 2024, Putin ordered exercises for tactical nuclear weapons. The Brookings Institution viewed this as a new phase of brinkmanship that demands an upgraded Western deterrence posture
. The American Enterprise Institute also noted in August 2023 that the Ukraine war is the start of a “new era of nuclear brinkmanship” involving Russia and other major powers.Justification for aggression and disinformation Since 2022, Putin has worked to shape the information environment to justify the invasion and destabilize Western countries.
• Blaming the West: In September 2025, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov claimed Moscow was in a “real war” with NATO and the EU, repeating the Kremlin’s long-standing narrative that the West provoked the conflict.
• Targeting Western values: Putin frames Russia as an upholder of “traditional values,” demonizing the West’s more liberal social views. This is designed to appeal to populist movements in Europe and the U.S. and drive internal division. [5, 20, 21, 22]Risks of miscalculation Several analysts have pointed out the increased danger of miscalculation and accidental escalation.
• Trump’s unpredictability: Some experts, including analysts at the European Council on Foreign Relations and CNN, cite the unpredictable nature of U.S. President Donald Trump’s potential reactions as a significant risk factor for miscalculation.
• Escalation ladder: The possibility of Article 4 consultations—emergency discussions within NATO—has increased in 2025, reminding observers of the alliance’s Article 5 mutual defense clause. While invoking Article 5 is a major step, the current tensions raise the risk of triggering the alliance’s collective defense mechanisms. [11, 23, 25, 26, 27]AI responses may include mistakes.
[1] europeanleadershipnetwork.or…
[2] bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
[3] understandingwar.org/researc…
[4] nato-pa.int/document/2025-01…
[5] politico.com/news/2025/09/25…
[6] foxnews.com/politics/putin-p…
[7] nato.int/cps/en/natohq/offic…
[8] youtube.com/watch?v=A6f8qHLd…
[9] newsweek.com/russia-ukraine-…
[10] newsweek.com/russia-nato-lav…
[11] ecfr.eu/article/flaunting-mi…
[12] understandingwar.org/researc…
[13] reuters.com/business/aerospa…
[14] ecfr.eu/article/flaunting-mi…
[15] atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/uk…
[16] aei.org/op-eds/welcome-to-th…
[17] brookings.edu/articles/nucle…
[18] latimes.com/world-nation/sto…
[19] graphicnews.com/en/pages/473…
[20] understandingwar.org/researc…
[21] brookings.edu/articles/how-t…
[22] cqpress.sagepub.com/cqresear…
[23] usnews.com/news/u-s-news-dec…
[24] cnn.com/2025/09/27/europe/pu…
[25] cnn.com/2025/09/27/europe/pu…
[26] russiamatters.org/news/russi…
[27] facebook.com/groups/51935517…
–— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Sep 27, 2025
Bryson DeChambeau has been shaking up the very buttoned up world of golf, with backlash over his YouTube trick shots, being branded a “captain’s nightmare” and sparking a ‘feud’ with Irish pro Rory McIlroy.
Tropical weather in the Atlantic is slamming the Caribbean and may strike Southeast US next [deltaMinutes] mins ago Now
CFOTO/Future Publishing via Getty Images
- Meta on Thursday unveiled Vibes, a feature on the Meta AI app that lets users create AI content.
- Users can cross-post AI-generated content onto other Meta platforms, including Instagram.
- Founders took to X to lambast the new feature, calling it “AI slop.”
They’re calling it “AI slop” that no one really asked for.
Tech founders and executives are dunking on Meta’s new feature, unveiled on Thursday. It allows users to generate AI content on the Meta AI app and share it on Facebook or Instagram.
Meta is calling it Vibes — a feature “designed to make it easier to find creative inspiration and experiment with Meta AI’s media tools.” Critics see it as a new way to get susceptible users hooked on mindless, artificially-generated content.
“AI was supposed to be about developing intelligence, instead they’re spending tens of billions of dollars to make it churn out cat videos so we’re more dumbed down by social media,” Arnaud Bertrand, investor and cofounder of HouseTrip, wrote on X. “What an insane waste of resources, in all respects.”
Meta’s chief AI officer, Alexandr Wang, has been getting the brunt of the criticisms on X, as tech founders reposted his announcement to roast the new feature.
Alex Cohen, cofounder and CEO of Hello Patient, a healthcare AI assistant platform, posted a meme with the caption: “FINALLY. PURE SLOP.”
Nikita Bier, head of product at X, which is supposed to be a competitor to Meta’s Threads, commented under Wang’s post: “give me the slop stream.”
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said on Threads that Vibes is a preview of some of the “new product directions” the company is exploring.
Some critics framed Meta’s new venture as a grave warning sign for how artificial intelligence, with all its potential, will be exploited.
Jake Cooper, founder of Railway, a software infrastructure platform, wrote on X that Meta’s Vibes is “not the future I would like to live in.”
“AI can and should be used for good/A partner in craft, allowing us to move faster to go farther,” he wrote. “It can also be used for evil/To hook you an infinite IV of cheap crap/Let’s choose the former please.”
This is not the first AI feature Meta rolled out that has been widely panned by critics who have been concerned with how the company targets its most vulnerable users, such as teens or lonely individuals.
After Meta unveiled chatbots, Business Insider’s senior correspondent Amanda Hoover wrote how Meta seems intent on luring more users to artificial friends amid the loneliness epidemic.
In August, the company had to tweak its AI chatbot so that it would stop engaging in romantic conversations with children.
Shyam Sankar, chief technology officer of Palantir Technologies, wrote on X that he found some comfort that many users appeared to “categorically reject this AI slop.”
He said AI shouldn’t be use for “frivolous pursuits that further fracture our attention and connection to humanity.” Instead, the technology should be used to “empower the American worker,” echoing the position of Palantir’s cofounder, Alex Karp, who often talks about how the tech industry should refocus its priorities on urgent challenges faced by the West.
“I’m just energized to see that a growing number of voices see this too,” Sankar wrote in an email to Business Insider. “Makes me optimistic that America will win.”
Read the original article on Business Insider
U.S. and Canadian aircraft tracked Russian military planes in the Alaska Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ).
Iran’s official urges regional unity against Israel as he visits allies in Lebanon [deltaMinutes] mins ago Now
U.S. Revokes Visa of Colombian President Following Controversial Protest Remarks
The United States has announced its decision to revoke the visa of Colombian President Gustavo Petro after he encouraged U.S. soldiers to “disobey” orders during a pro-Palestinian protest outside the United Nations headquarters in New York, reports 24brussels.
In a statement released on social media, the State Department condemned Petro’s “reckless and incendiary actions,” alleging that he incited U.S. military personnel to disregard orders and promote violence. Specific details regarding the visa revocation were not revealed.
Footage shared online captured Petro addressing a crowd of thousands while Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivered remarks to the General Assembly. In his speech, Petro proposed that his administration would introduce a UN resolution to create an “army for the salvation of the world,” which he asserted should prioritize the “liberation of Palestine.”
The US Department of State has said it will revoke the visa of Colombian President Gustavo Petro, citing his “reckless and incendiary actions” in relation to a speech he gave to protesters outside the UN headquarters in New York City https://t.co/xfPjA884qc pic.twitter.com/rzZpwz1KLe
— Al Jazeera English (@AJEnglish) September 27, 2025
During his address, Petro implored U.S. military personnel, stating, “I ask all of the soldiers of the army of the U.S. not to point their guns at humanity. Disobey the orders of Trump. Obey the orders of humanity.”
This demonstration coincided with Netanyahu’s call for global leaders to permit Israel to “finish the job” in Gaza, while criticizing nations that have recognized Palestinian statehood.
Since taking office in 2022, Petro has been vocal against Israel’s military actions in Gaza, referring to them as “genocide.” In 2024, he cut diplomatic ties with Israel and made parallels between its actions and the Holocaust. Earlier in July, Petro reinstated a ban on coal exports to Israel, asserting that Colombia would “not be complicit” in the ongoing conflict.
On social media, Petro reiterated his stance on the New York protests with messages declaring, “Free Palestine. If Gaza falls, humanity dies.” In the preceding week, at the General Assembly, he accused former U.S. President Donald Trump of complicity in genocide and urged for “criminal proceedings” against the U.S. for its military interventions in the Caribbean.
Neither Petro’s office nor Colombia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has commented on the U.S. government’s decision to revoke the visa.