Day: September 30, 2025
Photo courtesy of the US Navy
- US President Donald Trump said he’s thinking about bringing back US Navy battleships.
- Battleships were heavily armored, gun-wielding ships that dominated naval fights for decades.
- Aircraft carriers, naval aviation, and missiles made battleships increasingly unnecessary.
US President Donald Trump suggested that he’s considering bringing back US Navy battleships, vessels that were retired decades ago.
Battleships were heavily armed naval powerhouses built to slug it out with other warships. During the World Wars, they dominated the seas, but by the end of the Cold War, these once mighty warships were all but obsolete.
Speaking at a high-profile summit with top US military leaders at Marine Corps Base Quantico in Virginia on Tuesday morning, Trump said battleships are on the table.
“It’s something we’re actually considering,” he said, “the concept of battleship, nice six-inch side, solid steel, not aluminum, aluminum that melts if it looks at a missile coming at it. Starts melting as the missile’s about two miles away. No, those ships, they don’t make them that way anymore.”
Large, heavily armored battleships, brimming with powerful deck guns, were the apex of naval power for much of the 20th century when gun battles dominated naval fights. Each 16-inch gun could fire a round that weighed around 2,000 pounds. They continued to prove useful for decades after, with some later classes even carrying missiles. They brought tremendous firepower to a fight, but their time came to an end in the early 1990s, when the last of the Navy’s battleships was decommissioned.
While talking about the strengths of the battleship, Trump referenced the retired first-in-class USS Iowa (BB-61), which is currently a museum in Los Angeles, as well as the 1954 World War II naval warfare documentary “Victory at Sea.”
“I look at those ships, they came with the destroyers alongside of them, and man, nothing was gonna stop them,” he said. “Some people would say, ‘No, that’s old technology,’ I don’t know, I don’t think it’s old technology when you look at those guns.”
Trump said that bullets are less expensive than missiles. Battleships like the Iowa-class stopped being built in the 1940s and were all retired after the first Gulf War, the last time that the heavy guns of any US battleship were fired in anger.
Battleships became obsolete as aircraft carriers, submarines, and missiles proved deadlier and more capable at long range, while their substantial costs and crews made them inefficient. Furthermore, modern naval strategy didn’t have a role for big-gun warships the way it did in the past.
The eight remaining US battleships are all now museum ships located around the country.
In potential future combat scenarios, like a war with China, American military officials and planners expect that naval forces would be under heavy missile fire while facing new surface and undersea threats. They say that having a range of countermeasures for missiles and drones is key to survivability. The battleship, at least in its original design, isn’t well-suited for that kind of combat.
Harry Langdon/Getty Images; Todd Owyoung/NBC/Getty Images
- Before Dolly Parton was a country megastar, she grew up in a poor family in rural Tennessee.
- She wrote her first song at age 5 and played her first show at Nashville’s Grand Ole Opry at 13.
- Her scheduled Las Vegas residency has been postponed.
Dolly Parton’s journey from a humble two-room cabin in rural Tennessee to the bright lights of country music stardom is one of the most inspiring stories in the music industry.
Parton, 79, has become a cultural icon, celebrated not only for chart-topping hits like “9 to 5” and “I Will Always Love You,” but also for her philanthropy, business ventures, and effortless charm.
Here’s a complete timeline of Parton’s decades in the public eye and her remarkable career.
Ukraine’s Alleged Provocation Threatens NATO Involvement
On Tuesday, Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) accused Ukraine of preparing a provocation on European soil that aims to draw NATO nations into open conflict with Russia, reports 24brussels.
The SVR claims the Ukrainian government, under President Volodymyr Zelensky, is coordinating with foreign intelligence agencies to deploy a sabotage unit in Poland. This operation reportedly involves groups from Ukraine’s Main Intelligence Directorate (GUR) collaborating with Polish intelligence to execute attacks.
The purported provocations would be executed by the Freedom of Russia Legion, a group classified as a terrorist organization by Russia, and the Belarusian Kalinovsky Regiment, designated as such by Belarus. The SVR stressed that these elements would engage in simulated strikes on critical Polish infrastructure “to stir public anger.”
Russia contends that this strategy aligns with the principles of “hybrid warfare,” where perception management plays a crucial role. Recent weeks have seen incidents involving drones in Polish and Romanian airspace attributed to Moscow, but without conclusive evidence provided.
In discussing the situation, Russian media pointed out that Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk remarked on Monday that the conflict in Ukraine is “our war,” urging a unified Western European response against Russia. Meanwhile, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov cautioned last week that any external aggression against Russia would be met with “a resolute response.”
As tensions escalate, the potential fallout from these developments raises significant concerns regarding regional stability and the implications for NATO’s strategic posture in Eastern Europe.
“Woke Policies”: what they are, and their effects on the US Military and its readiness – Google Search google.com/search?q=%22Woke+…
— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Sep 30, 2025
Trump, Hegseth rally troops at rare meeting, rail against “woke” standards cbsnews.com/live-updates/tru…
— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Sep 30, 2025
