Day: September 12, 2025
Pau Barrena/AFP via Getty Images
- AT&T is dialing down its use of a controversial attendance tracking system for enforcing its RTO policy.
- The so-called presence report uses a combination of inputs to log employees’ time in the office.
- The company’s CMO says its goal of finding “freeloaders” has been met, though trust issues remain.
AT&T is reducing its reliance on an employee-attendance tracking system, admitting to workers that it hasn’t been fully accurate and is “driving people to the brink of frustration.”
The system, known internally as presence reporting, automatically tracks the hours workers spend at their assigned office. Most are required to log at least eight hours a day, five days a week, on-site.
The telecom giant is one of several companies, including Amazon, JP Morgan, and Microsoft, tightening return-to-office mandates and using new tech to track employee compliance. Executives at these companies say the moves boost collaboration and productivity, though the results so far are mixed.
In a meeting last month, chief marketing and growth officer Kellyn Kenny said her division is reducing its reliance on presence tracking in response to employee concerns about the system and its accuracy. The system was originally introduced to identify employees who weren’t showing up in the office.
“We recognize that there’s things about the report that are not correct,” she said, according to audio obtained by Business Insider. “It is not something that I expect anybody to be looking at on a daily, weekly, or even monthly basis.”
AT&T is also deemphasizing use of the tracking system for salaried employees companywide, a person familiar with the matter said.
CEO John Stankey indicated in a memo to staffers last month (reported exclusively by Business Insider) that AT&T was shifting its use of behavioral data, such as presence reports.
John Lamparski/Getty Images
“We analyze patterns of behaviors from broad cohorts,” he wrote, “to determine if the behavior being evaluated is consistent with our stated priorities and employment expectations.”
Stankey said that an individual’s data must differ “significantly” from their peers before their name is attached to the behavior.
“Some may view this approach as a matter of trust, and that perspective is understandable. In several forums, I’ve expressed concerns that past data indicated more outliers than we’d like,” he said.
Kenny said during the August meeting that the employee survey (which prompted the blunt memo from Stankey) had “lots of feedback” about the presence reports. She said the survey included critiques from workers who said they were struggling to make it to doctors’ appointments without running afoul of the system, for example.
While the survey does not appear to have included a direct question about presence reporting, it did ask whether employees agreed that AT&T’s “policies and systems support me in delivering my best work.”
Kenny said in the meeting that roughly half of the respondents in her organization said “no,” and that many voiced their concerns about the RTO mandate and presence reports in the freeform response.
“I now understand the level of anxiety that this report has created,” Kenny said. “I also now understand how the fact that it is inaccurate is driving people to the brink of frustration, and it’s creating distrust.”
Business Insider has spoken with roughly a dozen employees from multiple divisions of the company this year about the system and its impact on their workplace experience.
A spokesperson for AT&T declined to comment for this story, instead citing Stankey’s August memo.
AT&T isn’t the only company cracking down on RTO compliance
Multiple employees told Business Insider that the system doesn’t just log badge swipes at the entrance or exit; the presence report uses laptop network connections and mobile device location data to infer the hours an employee was at their assigned office.
The tool was rolled out in response to the RTO push that began two years ago, and its usage ramped up as the attendance policy grew increasingly strict.
Other companies, like Amazon and JP Morgan in particular, have also closely monitored employee behavior at work. Amazon previously used categories like “inconsistent badger” or “zero badger” depending on an employee’s compliance with a three-day in-office mandate. The company ended up nixing the labels in favor of providing raw badging data to managers to use at their discretion.
A recent survey by commercial real-estate company CBRE found that more than two-thirds of employers track employee compliance with attendance policies, and more than a third have taken some level of enforcement action.
EschCollection/Getty Images
Enforcement that is too strict or error-prone can cause other headaches within an organization — pushing out experienced employees, making it harder to hire new talent, or undermining motivation and trust within the organization. Amazon’s internal documents from last year indicated that its RTO policy was hampering its ability to recruit top AI talent, and a Harvard leadership expert said Meta’s abruptly shifting RTO effort in 2023 was likely to cause a “huge amount of distrust” in the company.
At the AT&T marketing and growth team meeting, Kenny said that the system helped leadership identify “freeloaders” who showed up for 30 minutes or two hours per day.
“There were people who badged in for 10 minutes, got themselves a cup of coffee, and then left,” she said. “The report was good for identifying the people who were abusing the system. We do not need this report for that purpose anymore, because we took action on the people who were the free riders.”
AT&T did not specify how many workers have been disciplined or dismissed in connection with their presence report information.
Tighter rules risk backfiring with workers who pull their weight
AT&T workers told Business Insider that apparent glitches in the system could also be a hassle for employees who were pulling their weight.
They said that in the first few months of this year, while the five-day RTO mandate was phasing in, their reports could be wrong by as many as several hours. In addition, briefly badging into an AT&T facility on a day off could trigger a person’s daily average hours to drop below the mandatory eight hours for the week.
“It was at its worst in March and April,” one worker in New Jersey told Business Insider. “Sometimes you’d step out for lunch, and then it would stop counting.”
Though there were no immediate consequences from an incorrect report, employees were concerned the erroneous data could make them targets for layoffs.
Some other business leaders have said RTO mandates have “encouraged” workers to quit voluntarily, allowing companies to avoid more expensive layoffs.
While AT&T previously told Business Insider the goal of its in-office rules is to foster better collaboration, it has also undertaken a multiyear effort to shrink its workforce. It started this year with around 140,000 employees, down from more than 160,000 at the start of 2023. Telecom competitors Verizon and T-Mobile started 2025 with 99,000 and 70,000, respectively.
Ronald Martinez/Getty Images
Stankey has said that the company is looking to cut some $6 billion in costs as it decommissions its legacy copper-based network in favor of new fiber and 5G technologies.
One worker in Georgia said that the presence reports changed the workplace reality for many salaried managerial workers, who aren’t used to such detailed tracking of their workday.
“We’re supposed to be able to work a more flexible thing as long as we get our work done,” he said.
Another effect of the crackdown on underperformers has been the erosion of motivation for some higher performers to put in extra time.
“The attitude has shifted,” the New Jersey employee said. “They only count eight hours, so I’m just going to work eight hours.”
The AT&T employees Business Insider spoke with said their presence reports have gotten more accurate over the past few months. One shared their report with annotations that showed such an improvement.
The question of employees’ trust could take more than a few months to resolve.
西伯利亚2项目和中亚的气体议价能力
从俄罗斯到中国的西伯利亚2(POS-2)管道的拟议权力重新进入了俄罗斯天然气工业股份公司和CNPC之间新备忘录的实力的头条新闻。俄罗斯称备忘录为“法律约束力”,但中国避免了这句话,因为唯一具有法律约束力的是协议的协议。
备忘录肯定设计容量每年高达500亿立方米(BCM/y),一条蒙古的路线,在越过蒙古领土之前,俄罗斯一侧的总树干长度约为2,600公里(km)。可行性工作突出了1,420毫米(56英寸)的管道直径,在某些贸易报告中引用的费用接近13-1.4亿美元。
政治信号很强,但定价术语仍未解决。对于中亚而言,意义是直接的:即使没有最终销售合同,对未来俄罗斯批量的期望也会加剧中国与土库曼斯坦,哈萨克斯坦和乌兹别克斯坦的谈判姿势,这三个州已经通过中亚亚洲 – 奇纳 – 奇纳瓦斯·帕利赛(CAGP)与中国相连的三个州。中亚的天然气供应中国中亚的西行进口走廊来自中亚组成如今,三个平行管道共同提供了55 bcm/y的标称容量(每条15 bcm/y的线“ a”和“ b”,以及在25 bcm/y时行“ c”)。前两条线的建设始于2008年,运营始于2009 – 2010年。线C在2014年输入服务。D,D,计划在30 BCM/Y到乌兹别克斯坦 – 塔吉克斯坦 – 凯里斯坦到中国,已经推迟了多年。如果完成,它将提高走廊的能力,向85 bcm/y。
土库曼斯坦是锚供应商。牛津能源研究研究所(OIE)估计它于2022年的32.9 BCM(大约占该国当年气体出口的81%)交付给中国,长期销售以与石油价格相关的配方构建。 Interfax报告说,在2025年的第二季度,土库曼斯坦汽油的价格低于每千立方米(MCM)的290美元。这个数字与石油价格连接相一致,而不是枢纽指数的欧洲基准。最近的行业和地区报告使土库曼斯坦的交付平均2020年代中期约35 bcm/y。
哈萨克斯坦已承诺供应高达10 bcm/y,但国内限制使实际流量降低。标普全球引用4.4 BCM在2022年和2023年为5.86 BCM,冬季中断以保护国内消费者;在2023年生产的29.8 BCM商业天然气中,在家中消耗了19.4 bcm。
随着Tashkent平衡国内需求,进口和掉期运营,乌兹别克斯坦的数量变化更大。詹姆斯敦著名的乌兹别克斯坦的气体出口价值从2022年的10.7亿美元降至2023年的5.635亿美元反弹在2024年和2025年根据用于基于中国海关的新闻摘要。POS-2的路线,蒙古守门和中亚的影响该路线的地理对中亚很重要。在俄罗斯方面,公共摘要描述了从雅马尔通过urengoy穿过克拉斯诺亚尔斯克和伊尔库茨克的走廊,然后在缅甸穿过蒙古边界附近的kyakhta。在蒙古,官方通讯压力整个草原上的地下装置和当地的经济福利,但最终的投资和所有权安排仍在待处理中,该项目的日程安排仍然取决于具有约束力的俄罗斯 – 中国天然气销售协议,该协议已经避开了十多年的谈判者。
一个关键的近期现实是Ulaanbaatar的政策优先级。 2024年8月,多个媒体报告那个蒙古省略POS-2/SOYUZ VOSTOK从其国家发展计划到2028年,谨慎行事。 2025年,俄罗斯和蒙古官员强调了环境评估和政府间合作的进展,但较早的遗漏强调了该项目的不抗可取性。
POS-2的前景通过三种方式影响中亚。首先,它提供竞争的参考:即使没有进行实际交付,在与土库曼斯坦,哈萨克斯坦和乌兹别克斯坦的价格谈判中,北京的50 bcm/y的未来俄罗斯选项也能使北京讨价还价。其次,它可以使中国投资组合对冲提供在LNG采购周期中针对斑点波动率的稳定器。第三,随着物理天然气仍然存在数年,蒙古的门控窗给其他供应商的杠杆作用。地理和系统互动如果要进行POS-2,将会发生重大的系统级变化。首先,入口点将转移,中国对中亚天然气的单一新疆入境的依赖也将发生变化。其次,新的走廊将增加中国在液化天然气,POS-1,POS-2和CAGP流入中套利的灵活性。第三,蒙古传输将降低中亚过境的相对战略保费。
POS-2最难的商业问题一直是价格。欧洲历史上为俄罗斯提供了管道天然气的高利润指标。中国抵制了西伯利亚货量的类似欧洲的价格,更喜欢与石油连接的配方。最新的备忘录小号路线和能力,同时避免出版的价格公式。定价遗迹尚未确定:POS-2反复滑倒的核心原因。
然而,中国的西行管道系统已经在三个中亚供应商中赋予了北京的物理选择性,而土库曼斯坦则以数量为单位。现有的55 BCM/Y走廊,即使是D延迟线的可能性,也将扩张中国的投资组合甚至在任何俄罗斯天然气通过POS-2到达之前就进行了谈判空间。中亚的教训中亚天然气外交通常是双边的。涉及协调生产,同步维护和对齐过境规则的“托管寡头”的转变将改变北京的算术。即使是基本步骤也可能有效。 POS-2的遥远前景增加了对不团结的惩罚,因为即使是俄罗斯天然气的50 bcm/y的阴影也会放大中国的步入式选择。
对于中亚而言,这有两种重要性。首先,每个月没有俄罗斯 – 中国的价格是一个月,土库曼斯坦可以强调交货,哈萨克斯坦可以出售季节性的牢固性,乌兹别克斯坦可以市场可靠性。土库曼斯坦自己的合同,与石油价格有关,最近实现的价格低于290美元/mcm,这表明中亚卖家已经在适合北京偏好的定价制度中工作。
中亚的底线是,他们的杠杆作用不在俄罗斯缺乏公共价格公式的假设流中,而是涉及已经流动的东西和蒙古尚未批准的东西。中亚政府可以通过强调可靠性,适度的协调性和可靠的选择性来将这一现实转化为改进的术语。这些策略共同将POS-2汇总为一项战略,该战略是否是对中亚天然气外交的长期限制,还是中亚人转向自己的优势的短期讨价还价筹码。
