Following a strong showing in his first NFL preseason, Shannon Sharpe had nothing but good things to say about New York Giants rookie quarterback Jaxson Dart.
Day: August 25, 2025
Illinois attorney general says president’s actions are ‘un-American’ and there is no emergency as Pentagon official confirms plans to send troops to city
Hello and welcome to the US politics live blog. My name is Tom Ambrose and I’ll be bringing you the latest news lines over the next few hours.
We start with news that Donald Trump has been accused of “turning the military on American citizens” after a Pentagon official confirmed that planning is under way to send National Guard troops to Chicago.
His actions are not just un-American. They are unwise strategically. Our cities are not made safer by deploying the nation’s service members for civilian law enforcement duties when they do not have the appropriate training.
To be clear: We have made no such request for the type of federal intervention we have seen in Los Angeles or Washington DC. There is no emergency in the state of Illinois.
Tonight’s reporting from the Washington Post that President Trump is preparing to deploy federal troops in Chicago proves what we all know: he is willing to go to any lengths possible to create chaos if it means more political power-no matter who gets hurt.
As lieutenant-governor and throughout my career, I’ve fervently fought for the reformation of our criminal legal system and under the Pritzker-Stratton administration, we’ve made tremendous progress.
France summoned the American ambassador Charles Kushner after he wrote a letter to president Emmanuel Macron alleging France had failed to do enough to stem antisemitic violence, a French foreign ministry spokesperson said on Sunday.
Sergei Lavrov, Moscow’s most senior diplomat, praised efforts by Donald Trump to end the war, in an interview on NBC on Sunday, while US vice-president JD Vance said Washington would “keep on trying” to broker talks in the absence of a deal.
In the opening weeks of Donald Trump’s second term, Gavin Newsom wagered that peacemaking was best: a tarmac greeting for Air Force One, an Oval Office visit and a podcast slot for Maga’s biggest names. But then Trump came for California, and its governor dropped the niceties. Read the full report here.
The president and his allies have been accused of executing a “pattern of lawfare” akin to those exerted by authoritarian regimes in Hungary and Russia after adopting a new strategy to target political opponents: allegations of mortgage fraud. Read the full report here.
The justice department is alleging in a new court filing that three Smartmatic executives who were indicted last year on bribery and money-laundering charges transferred money from a 2018 voting machine contract with Los Angeles county into slush funds that were originally set up to pay bribes to overseas election officials.
WANAN YOSSINGKUM/Getty Images
- Companies such as Microsoft, Coinbase, and Shopify now require workers to use generative AI.
- Some are even using tracking software to identify team members who aren’t complying.
- Regular use of AI among frontline employees has stalled at 51%, recent survey data show.
In a growing number of workplaces, using generative AI tools like ChatGPT isn’t optional for employees.
Companies such as Microsoft, Coinbase, and Shopify now require it. Some are even using tracking software to identify which workers aren’t complying, among other reasons.
These AI proponents credit the technology for boosting productivity, which could help them reduce their labor costs or increase output.
A lot is at stake. The average amount of money employers spent on AI doubled in 2024 from the year prior to $10.3 million, according to estimates from management-consulting firm Bain & Co.
Yet not all workers are on board the AI train. While more than three-quarters of leaders and managers say they use generative AI several times a week, regular use among frontline employees has stalled at 51%, a June survey from Boston Consulting Group shows.
We’d like to hear from you. Do you use AI at work? Tell us about your experience with AI in the workplace in the survey below.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Ikanbi Belgium Faces Job Cuts as TotalEnergies Ends Contract
Ikanbi Belgium has lost a contract with the energy company TotalEnergies, putting up to 150 jobs at risk at its Liège call centre unless it manages to find new customers. The news was confirmed by the socialist trade union following reports from the French-language public broadcaster RTBF. Once the contract with TotalEnergies expires at the end of the year, inquiries in French will be redirected to Morocco, while Dutch calls will continue in Belgium, albeit handled by a different provider, reports 24brussels.
The socialist trade union indicated that approximately 150 employees at Ikanbi work on the TotalEnergies contract, which includes around 50 permanent staff and 100 temporary workers. Their roles involve assisting customers with their bills, negotiating contracts, and managing adjustments to meter readings.
“The activity is under threat from artificial intelligence and digitisation, and Belgian customers want ever lower costs,” said Patrick Masson, a union representative.
“We will try to save as many jobs as possible by finding new customers within the next four months,” Masson added. He expressed concerns that TotalEnergies’ decision could set a precedent, with other large companies potentially following suit.
This development underscores a broader trend in the industry, where call centres grapple with the pressures of technological advancements and competitive pricing demands from clients. The future of Ikanbi and its workforce hangs in the balance as they seek alternative contracts to mitigate the impending layoffs.
Japan is one of the countries that has been most active in recent years in terms of deepening political and economic relations with the republics of Central Asia. However, the geopolitical and ideological grounds for Tokyo’s activism have received less attention than those of other countries. In early August 2024, then Prime Minister Fumio Kishida was scheduled to visit the region, but the visit was cancelled at the last minute due to the risk of a major earthquake that could have struck Japan at that time. During his visit, Kishida was also expected to announce the launch of an economic aid package for the Central Asian republics.
As confirmed by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Tokyo, Japanese Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya is visiting the region over the coming days, landing in Kazakhstan on August 24, before moving on to Uzbekistan until August 28. In the two countries, he will meet with his Kazakh and Uzbek counterparts, Murat Nurtleu and Bakhtiyor Saidov, respectively, with the aim in both cases of strengthening bilateral relations.
Japan’s interest in Central Asia is long-standing: the Central Asia Plus Japan Dialogue format was launched back in 2004, a platform that has been emulated by several countries in the following years. From a political point of view, this is a very smooth relationship, as confirmed to The Times of Central Asia by Timur Dadabaev, Professor of International Relations at the University of Tsukuba.
“Japan’s engagement with Central Asia is driven less by immediate material gain and more by its pursuit of trust-building diplomacy,” Dadabaev told TCA. “It is a relationship rooted in Japan’s desire to be seen as a reliable, non-imperial partner that supports the sovereignty, stability, and regional agency of Central Asian states. Unlike other powers, Japan positions itself as a ‘distant neighbor without hidden agendas,’ which makes its initiatives particularly well-received. Over the years, this has translated into Japan being perceived not as a competing hegemon, but as a partner that invests in the region’s human capital, infrastructure, and governance in ways that reinforce independence rather than dependence.”
The relationship between Japan and the Central Asian republics is based on many concrete elements – cooperation on energy, migrant workers, and connectivity – which, as Tomohiko Uyama, Professor of Modern History and Politics of Central Asia at Slavic-Eurasian Research Center at the Hokkaido University pointed out to TCA, represent the basis for broader diplomatic engagement.
“The relationship between Japan and Central Asia is based on geopolitical factors. For Japan, Central Asia is a region that shares troublesome neighbors, Russia and China,” Uyama said. “Increasing Japan’s presence in this region is important for curbing the excessive expansion of China and Russia’s global influence. However, strengthening diplomatic relations requires fostering economic and human relations. Therefore, in addition to its traditional technical cooperation, Japan is seeking to promote decarbonization, transportation connectivity, and human resource development.”
Professor Dadabaev also stresses that the two dimensions – the one linked more to concrete elements and the one that has more to do with political elements – go hand in hand: “Economic ties such as energy cooperation and labor mobility are important, but they do not exhaust the relationship. What makes Japan’s approach unique is its political symbolism: it recognizes Central Asia as a region with its own voice and aspirations. Japan’s cooperation extends to governance reform, human resource development, and regional connectivity. This signals that the partnership is as much about political trust and identity as it is about trade”.
More than two decades ago, Japan was the first country to launch a formal “C5+1”–style framework that grouped all five Central Asian states together as a single partner. This forum for dialogue continues to form the basis of Tokyo’s commitment to the region, thanks in part to some of its unique characteristics. “Unlike transactional models, Japan’s ‘Central Asia plus Japan’ is dialogue-oriented, not dictate-oriented,” Dadabaev told TCA. “Its features are humility, long-term commitment, and the deliberate avoidance of zero-sum geopolitics. What stands out is that Japan’s approach is not about quick wins but about establishing predictable, rules-based relations with the region. This explains why the format, introduced by Japan, has since been emulated by other major powers, yet continues to carry credibility precisely because Japan does not tie it to coercive conditions or geopolitical pressure.”
Over the years, Japan’s approach, while retaining its distinctive characteristics, has changed in some respects in order to respond to China’s growing influence in Central Asia. The relationship between Tokyo and Beijing is characterized by a dual track: on the economic front, there is growing interdependence, while on the political front, a high degree of mutual distrust continues to persist.
Central Asia is a region where this competition is further represented. Professor Uyama notes that, “Japan’s policy toward non-Western countries emphasizes responding to the needs of each country’s development rather than imposing Japan’s interests and values, with a particular emphasis on grassroots cooperation with local communities. Furthermore, as Japan has stated from the outset of the ‘Central Asia + Japan’ dialogue that it aims to serve as a catalyst for regional integration, it hopes to provide support for cooperation among Central Asian countries. However, in recent years, as China’s influence in development cooperation has grown, Japan has been seeking to strengthen cooperation on global issues, such as environmental problems.”
Ultimately, Tokyo’s Central Asia play is a long-horizon bet on trust and delivery. By coupling diplomacy with concrete work on decarbonization, transport corridors, skills, and governance, Japan is proposing a rules-based partnership that prizes sovereignty and predictability over quick transactional wins. The near-term test is execution: converting dialogue into financed projects, expanding people-to-people programs and lawful labor pathways, and aligning standards so freight, finance, and data move more smoothly. If Japan sustains that approach – and Central Asian capitals keep using the format to cooperate with one another as well as with Tokyo – the relationship should outlast news cycles and great-power swings, giving the region a reliable external partner and Japan a durable role as the ‘distant neighbor’ that shows up.
Tel Aviv – The office of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced on Monday that Israel is prepared to assist Lebanon in disarming Hezbollah, welcoming a significant step from the Lebanese national government aimed at the same end.
The Prime Minister’s Office praised Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam for their cabinet’s decision to disarm Hezbollah by the end of 2025, describing it as an opportunity for Lebanon to restore its national sovereignty and bolster its institutions, reports 24brussels.
In what ways is Israel ready to assist Lebanon?
“Israel views this as a major step and an opportunity for Lebanon to reclaim its sovereignty and rebuild its state institutions, army, and government without interference from non-state actors,”
the statement from the Prime Minister’s office read.
Israel reiterated its willingness to aid Lebanon in disarming Hezbollah and working toward a safer, stable future for both nations. The statement indicated that if Lebanese security forces proceed to confiscate Hezbollah’s weapons, Israel would respond in kind, potentially including a phased withdrawal of its troops in coordination with the US.
“Now is the time for Israel and Lebanon to move forward in a spirit of cooperation, focusing on the shared goal of disarming Hezbollah and promoting stability and prosperity for both nations,”
the statement concluded.
How does Lebanon’s cabinet plan to dismantle Hezbollah’s weapons?
Recently, the Lebanese government approved a US proposal for the disarmament of Hezbollah by the year’s end, which includes ending Israeli military operations and the withdrawal of Israeli forces from five positions in southern Lebanon. This proposal was met with rejection from Hezbollah, which labeled the government’s compliance with US and Israeli directives as “foolish.”
“We will treat this decision as if it does not exist …”
Why did Hezbollah reject the government’s disarmament agreement?
Since the conclusion of the Israel-Hezbollah war in November, which ended with a US-brokered ceasefire, Hezbollah officials have maintained that they will not consider disarmament until Israel withdraws from the five hills currently under its control in Lebanon. The group insists that Israel must cease its frequent airstrikes, which have predominantly targeted Hezbollah members in recent months. Despite the ceasefire, Israeli air assaults resumed sporadically, justifying Hezbollah’s continued refusal to disarm.
Kayla Bartkowski/Getty; Tyler Le/BI
- The billionaire founder of Citadel and Citadel Securities has a bigger public profile than ever.
- Ken Griffin’s political and philanthropic giving has introduced him to audiences beyond the financial sector.
- He has laid out his priorities, which reveal how the billionaire is trying to mold America.
Ken Griffin has never been one to hold back his opinion — there are just more people listening now.
After decades of influencing the world of finance and markets, the billionaire founder of Citadel and Citadel Securities has lately found himself talking more about education and immigration than his firms. He’s stepped into national debates — saying Trump’s tariff policies were “eroding” the US brand, for example — and is helping shape Miami, where he’s set to headline a leadership summit alongside Will Smith and Lionel Messi.
As one of the biggest donors to the GOP and one of the country’s most generous philanthropists, Griffin is shaping conversations well beyond Wall Street or Greenwich country clubs. These days, there is just as likely to be a headline about him in Politico as in The Wall Street Journal. And he’s in demand.
“We’re batting down 10 requests for every speaking engagement he does,” said Cason Carter, Citadel’s head of public affairs, in an interview with Business Insider.
Griffin hasn’t sought out more publicity in recent years, say those close to him. He’s on pace to speak roughly the same amount of time this year as he has in years past — roughly 20 times per annum — but his increased political clout, thanks to his ever-expanding wealth, has given his words more oomph.
His goals are clear. Griffin has laid out his priorities for donating his billions via Griffin Catalyst, his “civic engagement initiative.” He’s backed research into Parkinson’s, invested in charter schools, and helped pay for a new coach for the US men’s soccer team. He produced a musical about World War I, and just last month, he bought a rare copy of the Emancipation Proclamation.
What ties it all together isn’t a stated political agenda but a set of values Griffin consistently returns to, such as innovation, meritocracy, and national pride.
In theory, it’s a map of how the 56-year-old Florida native, who has given more than $2 billion to charity, wants to change the world. In practice, it’s how he’s building his legacy beyond finance.
Policies, not politics
Griffin — who is worth more than $48 billion, according to Bloomberg — burst into national recognition during the GameStop trading frenzy in early 2021.
His market-making firm was targeted by Reddit-reading retail investors who believed it was manipulating trading because of its relationship with upstart platform Robinhood. Websites and hashtags claiming Griffin was lying or deceiving day traders emerged. The firms denied the conspiracy claims, and reports from the SEC and House Financial Services Committee backed them up.
In the years since Griffin appeared in front of Congress to explain his firms’ role in the meme-stock mania, the billionaire has enjoyed one of the best stretches in his fund’s history — with a staggering 38.1% gain in 2022 when stock markets were down globally — and accelerated a large-scale effort to mold the country into a version he believes has been lost.
The website for Griffin Catalyst, which launched in the fall of 2023, outlines his priorities: education, science and medicine, communities, upward mobility, freedom and democracy, and enterprise and innovation.
Courtesy Sotheby’s
The causes Griffin has backed, even before the formal creation of Catalyst, range from apolitical topics like funding technology that uses robotics to plant new coral reefs to ones that could be branded as partisan, such as free speech or aiding the COVID-19 vaccine creation and distribution. Carter said that Griffin’s giving — both charitably and in the political realm — is “focused on policies and principles.”
His relationship with President Donald Trump is a clear example. He gave more than $100 million to congressional GOP politicians and super PACs last election cycle; he did not back Trump’s 2024 campaign but said he voted for him in November. (He gave $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund, as did many companies and donors. He also gave money to former President Joe Biden’s inauguration fund in 2021.)
The two billionaires have plenty in common — an Ivy League education, sprawling Palm Beach properties, a love of McDonald’s — but Griffin is not afraid to publicly deride policies he disagrees with, while acknowledging the administration’s wins.
Viewing his giving solely through a political lens ignores the broader goals of Griffin Catalyst. There’s a nonpartisan pride in the country he aspires to bring back, a source familiar with Griffin’s goals said.
Catalyst is one of the supporters of a project beneath the Lincoln Monument that’s set to be unveiled at the 250th anniversary of the US in 2026. He quoted John Adams in an op-ed in Harvard’s student paper last year and produced a play that “tells the epic story of America’s triumph in World War I” with the conductor of Hamilton arranging the music. He gave millions to charter planes to bring home Americans living in Wuhan during the outbreak of COVID-19.
On a podcast hosted by S&P Global this year, talking about the nitty-gritty of running his firms, he quoted not Warren Buffett or Jack Welch, but Abraham Lincoln: “Things may come to those who wait, but only things left by those who hustle.”
Not yet leaving his perch
Earlier this year, in a LinkedIn poll peppered with emojis, a former investor for Griffin, Doug Garber, asked what his network thinks his former boss will do after his “rebrand from the hedge fund GOAT to a top philanthropist.”
The choices Garber, who now hosts the podcast “Pitch the PM,” gave did not capture every path Griffin could take, but provided a snapshot into what people think the billionaire may do next, namely, politics. Two of the four options — a presidential run or a campaign for Florida governor — were political, though the top-selected answer was staying in his seat atop Citadel and Citadel Securities.
People close to Griffin said the same thing Griffin has when asked about a campaign or a potential job in government: It’s not in the cards, but if he were asked to serve his country or if the US needed him, he would do it.
He’s built his firms to last beyond him. Citadel Securities has a CEO, Peng Zhao, who handles the day-to-day operations, while Griffin’s hedge fund has a co-CIO, Pablo Salame, who worked for decades at Goldman Sachs before joining the firm in 2019. Griffin has sold a stake of his market-making business and said last year that he’d be open to selling a stake in Citadel to the right partner.
If he does pursue a political office one day, he will face an electorate skeptical of the top 1% of the 1%. For example, Michael Bloomberg’s 2020 presidential campaign flopped even though he outspent his opponents.
Joe Raedle / Getty Images
Hedge funds will always be seen with a “jaundiced view” by the general public, said Chris Keohan, a partner at Shawmut Strategies, a consulting group started by Mitt Romney campaign alums.
“For someone like Ken Griffin, you really have to put the effort in on raising your profile on the community level,” who might only know you as the rich guy on the news, Keohan said. In Miami, where the headquarters of Griffin’s two firms’ has been located since 2022, his presence is felt in plenty of ways.
He’s building a new tower that will change the city’s skyline and has taken public stances on local issues such as marijuana legalization and the expansion of casinos in Florida. He’s spoken at local schools, including his Boca Raton high school, and donated to area hospitals.
He’s funding the construction of 50 mini soccer fields around Miami-Dade County. He bought a $107 million compound in the city’s posh Coconut Grove neighborhood and owns acres of ultra-exclusive Star Island.
Because of his political giving, “he can really control the field” in Florida if he were to decide to run, Keohan said.
“Do his ideas meet the moment” will determine his fate in any race, but a Senate seat from Florida or the Sunshine State’s governorship are in range, Keohan said.
“Maybe even the presidency at some point.”
Read the original article on Business Insider
The neighbor had “never owned a dog before, let alone one this big.”
Multiple journalists killed by Israeli strikes on Gaza hospital [deltaMinutes] mins ago Now
The rapper spoke of how an LGBTQ+ theme left his grandson asking questions he could not answer.