Categories
Selected Articles

Texas governor threatens to remove Democrats who left state over Trump-backed redistricting

Categories
Selected Articles

Putin Open to Zelensky Talks

The Kremlin announced that the Russian president was prepared to meet his Ukrainian counterpart after “preparatory work at the expert level.”
Categories
Selected Articles

EU health commissioner attends Oasis concert

Fans of the band Oasis have reportedly set a record for the highest beer consumption at a musical event in Wembley Stadium, drinking twice as much as Coldplay supporters and six times more than those of Taylor Swift. The event, which saw ticket prices rise significantly, became notable not only for the music but also for the impressive drinking statistics, and the record was highlighted despite the steep cost of pints reaching £8 each, reports 24brussels.

While there was significant celebration and enthusiasm among attendees, it was noted that many EU deals seem to continually “Slide Away,” suggesting that critics of the recent trade agreements, particularly with the U.S., view the situation as lacking a coherent “Masterplan.”

The record consumption of beer at the event has ignited discussions regarding consumer behavior at major concerts, particularly how pricing influences attendance and bar sales. In light of these discussions, concert organizers may reassess pricing strategies for future events to balance profit margins with fan experiences.

Further reporting revealed that rising ticket costs and concessions have created a challenging dynamic for fans, who are eager to enjoy live performances but may feel the financial strain. As festivals and concerts resume post-pandemic, audience expectations are evolving, with potential implications for promoter strategies.

As this record-breaking beer consumption continues to make headlines, it will be interesting to see if it prompts similar records at other venues, or if the logistical challenges of serving large crowds during high-demand concerts become a topic of consideration for organizers. The trend could influence future event planning and marketing strategies in the music industry.

In summary, Oasis fans have made their mark in Wembley history not just through their music but also through an extraordinary feat of beer consumption, raising questions and discussions about fan experiences, pricing, and the future of live events.

Categories
Selected Articles

We tried Wonder, Marc Lore’s food hall venture, to see if it’s the all-in-one meal option executives promise

A side-by-side image of a woman with a Wonder takeout bag and a man in front of a restaurant.
We tried Wonder’s food hall and delivery.

  • Marc Lore’s Wonder is opening dozens of locations.
  • Wonder combines the efficiencies of a ghost kitchen with dine-in, pick-up, and delivery options.
  • Business Insider ordered from two Wonder food halls to see what the experience is like.

Wonder, Marc Lore‘s latest startup, promises great food and fast service — and that’s a big promise.

The company, which started off serving made-to-order food from vans in suburban New Jersey, has pivoted to opening food halls. Each Wonder location uses a single kitchen to cook food from several menus devised by celebrity chefs, from Marcus Samuelsson to Bobby Flay. You can get your food any way you could want it, from dining in to picking it up to having someone drop it off at your front door.

In short, Wonder wants to be the “super app for mealtime,” as a company executive told Business Insider in February.

Wonder has 56 locations open, all on the East Coast of the US. By the end of 2025, the company expects to have 90 locations.

Business Insider ordered from two Wonder food halls — one in New York City, the other in Washington, DC — to see if the experience is as wonderful as promised.

Here’s what we found:

Reporter Alex Bitter visited this Wonder location in Washington, DC.
The entrance to a Wonder food hall in Washington, DC, with a white, lighted

This Wonder location opened in July and sits near the intersection of 14th Street Northwest and U Street Northwest — a place with lots of apartments and townhomes nearby, as well as a lively nightlife scene.

It’s the first of several locations that Wonder plans to open in the Washington, DC area.

Wonder’s Food Hall was new, clean, and welcoming.
The order and pick-up area at Wonder on 14th Street

As I (Alex) walked into this Wonder location, I found it bright, clean, and easy to navigate. There were tablets for placing orders to the left and a pick-up area with shelves to hold orders on the right.

Through a doorway between the two was the kitchen. Wonder uses a single kitchen to prepare food from many different menus — a setup similar to a ghost kitchen.

I noticed these colorful printed menus on the shelves by the ordering area.
Paper menus from Wonder's various restaurant concepts, including Burger Baby and Streetbird, sit in racks on a wall

Besides scrolling on a tablet, you could look at a printed menu before ordering. Each menu was designed by a different celebrity chef.

I scrolled through the touchscreen to see my options.
The ordering touchscreen at a Wonder location, which includes menus for specific restaurant concepts as well as dishes organized by category

After scrolling through the options, I decided on M’s Spicy Fried Chicken Deluxe Sandwich Combo with Streetbird Slaw and a bottled lemonade ($13.95) from Streetbird by Marcus Samuelsson as well as a Sirloin Steak ($28) from The Mainstay by Marc Murphy.

Not everything on the tablet was available.
An ordering screen at Wonder reads:

When I tried to look at items from Bobby Flay Steak, I got a message saying that the restaurant was “closed.”

I’m not sure what this meant. Wonder relies on a single kitchen to make orders at each location, and the kitchen here was clearly open.

There was some seating for in-store diners at this Wonder location.
The dine-in seating at Wonder's 14th Street location in Washington, DC

There was enough seating at this Wonder food hall for around a dozen dine-in customers. I was visiting on a weekday night just before 8 p.m., and the location wasn’t busy.

The seats were comfortable, but it didn’t feel quite like a “food hall,” which conjures up images for me of chefs preparing food in front of you or some other visual entertainment as you wait for your food.

The layout seemed focused on takeout and delivery orders.
The order pick-up shelves at Wonder

The design of this Wonder food hall seemed optimized for delivery. Workers from the kitchen brought out orders destined for delivery customers, while a steady stream of drivers came in and out of the store.

After exactly 10 minutes, my order was ready.
A Wonder to-go bag with the author's order

I barely had time to wash up in the restroom and snoop around the store before my steak and sandwich were ready. The wait time was shorter than many of the experiences I’ve had at fast-food restaurants in the last few years.

Everything looked good at first glance.
A steak, fried chicken sandwich, lemonade, and coleslaw from Wonder.

The steak and sandwich were warm and obviously fresh out of the kitchen as I took them out of the bag. This spread cost just under $50.

I enjoyed the chicken sandwich.
A spicy chicken sandwich from Wonder sits in a foil wrapper

Unlike a lot of fried chicken sandwiches at this price point, this one used a whole cut of chicken instead of a processed patty. And while I could’ve used a little more spice, the sauce was flavorful.

The Sirloin steak was more marginal.
The Sirloin steak in a foil tray from Wonder

The steak, which I ordered to be cooked medium, felt slightly rarer than that.

More importantly, it had hardly been seared, which meant that I didn’t get that beefy hit that even cheap steaks can provide. Perhaps I should’ve paid a little more to smother it in one of the optional sauces.

As a home chef, I know that good steaks don’t take long to cook. I would’ve loved to watch how Wonder’s staff prepared this one.

The coleslaw was tasty.
A cup of coleslaw at a Wonder food hall

I appreciated that the coleslaw wasn’t too wet or sweet like some fast-food versions of the dish are.

The lemonade was sugary but not bad.
A bottle of Harney & Sons Organic lemonade.

Wonder seemed to be saving time and work by offering drinks in bottles, cans, and other packages. There weren’t any soda fountains in sight.

Overall, it was a fine, but unremarkable, meal.
The reporter standing outside of Wonder's food hall on 14th Street in Washington, DC

I might come back for the fried chicken sandwich. That, plus the fast service, means I might stop by again to try something new from Wonder’s several menus.

But I probably won’t be ordering a steak here again.

Editor Ashley Rodriguez ordered from Wonder for delivery in New York City.
The author posing with her bag of food from Wonder

I (Ashley) used the Seamless app to place my order mid-afternoon on a weekday. More than 20 Wonder “restaurants” seemed to be available during lunchtime.

Most of them weren’t labeled Wonder brands, though, so it wasn’t immediately obvious without checking the address.

I ordered from a location in Staten Island, New York.

We had Wonder deliver the food to our home in Staten Island.
An ordering screen on the Seamless app for food from Wonder

Each menu had a handful of starters and entrées unique to the restaurant, along with the same selection of kids’ options (chicken tenders or Mac and cheese), beverages, and desserts.

The limited menus made it hard to find something everyone in my family of three was excited about. We settled on shawarma from Maydan by Wonder (one of five I saw with Wonder in the name).

We ordered lamb shawarma, vegetable shawarma, and a sea salt chocolate chip cookie. It came out to $47.50 before tax, tip, and the app service fee. Even with the $7 credit I got for spending at least $35 on my first order, it was steeper than I’d usually pay for shawarma, of which there’s no shortage of spots nearby.

Using a third-party app complicated our order.
A notification in the Seamless app reads:

While Wonder says that it offers a wide selection of mix-and-match meal options from its different menus, ordering through an app like Grubhub, which Wonder bought in January for $650 million, or its sister app Seamless, limits you to a single restaurant.

When I tried to add items from more than one Wonder menu to my order on the Seamless app, I got a prompt indicating that I would need to place a separate order.

A spokesperson for Wonder said that the company’s own app or website “is the most seamless way to enjoy the full mix-and-match experience across our menus.”

“Seamless and Grubhub currently list each of our brands individually, and we’re actively exploring ways to improve that experience,” the spokesperson said.

The food came quickly — on the low end of the estimate in the app.
A bag of Wonder food sits on a porch

I ordered at 2:08 p.m. and was given a 29 to 44-minute delivery window. When I checked the app at 2:37 p.m. to see the status of my order, it had already been delivered.

The food inside the bag was what I had ordered.
The author's Wonder order unpacked from its bag

Though it sat on my doorstep in the rain for a few minutes, the food arrived warm and well packaged. A trio of sauces I’d selected came included with each shawarma.

The shawarma tasted better than it looked.
Lamb shawarma from Wonder, served in a pita bread and topped with cilantro. Three dips sit in small cups next to the wrap.

The meal itself looked a bit sad, with the herbs wilted and the vegetables overly soft.

But I was pleasantly surprised when I bit in. The vegetables tasted fresh and well seasoned, and the sauces were flavorful.

One of my dining partners said that the lamb shawarma was a bit one-note. The lamb didn’t have the characteristic shaved texture of shawarma, but it was fine overall.

The cookie was big — and tasty.
The author holds a cookie from Wonder in front of her face

The chocolate chip and sea salt cookie was large, soft-baked, and very good — it better have been for $5.

I might try Wonder again if it’s easier to order from multiple menus.
Lamb shawarma with three sauces from Wonder

As someone who typically orders for a family of three with different tastes and dietary restrictions (I’m vegetarian), I would be much more likely to order from Wonder again if I could choose from its range of menu options like you can in the food hall.

I might have ordered a salad (I’ve ordered from Wonder’s Royal Greens menu before and enjoy their concoctions), while my husband could have gotten Tejas Barbecue or Streetbird.

All in all, we enjoyed the meal for what it was. We wouldn’t go out of our way to order it again, but it was a quick, convenient, mildly healthy option (there were vegetables) when we were otherwise too busy to cook.

Read the original article on Business Insider
Categories
Selected Articles

Chinese woman becomes third person charged under Australia’s foreign interference laws

Chinese woman becomes third person charged under Australia’s foreign interference laws
Categories
Selected Articles

Trains are canceled and events called off as a major storm hits Scotland

Trains are canceled and events called off as a major storm hits Scotland [deltaMinutes] mins ago Now
Categories
Selected Articles

The company rejected my job app. I reached out to the hiring manager anyway — and landed the role.

Matthew Pastorius
Matthew Pastorius got a job he was initially rejected for after contacting the hiring manager.

  • Matthew Pastorius secured a job after initially being rejected and getting an automated response.
  • He messaged people on LinkedIn to get contact info for the hiring manager and reached out.
  • Pastorius said the person who helped him showed a “graciousness” that job seekers don’t always get.

Matthew Pastorius, 34, has worked in sales and hopes to work in human resources. In 2023, after receiving a speedy rejection for a job he said he was well-qualified for, he contacted the hiring manager and ultimately landed the role. The following has been edited for brevity and clarity.

I saw the job posting, and was like, “Oh my God. This is the perfect role for me based on my experience and my interests.” I was infatuated with the company from the jump, so I threw my hat in the ring. Within 24 hours, I got what seemed like an automated email response: “Thank you, but no thank you,” essentially.

I was just like, “Wait a second. That is not possible. You can’t tell me that you looked at my résumé and said, “This guy doesn’t even come close to what we’re looking for.”

Not taking the ‘no’

I thought, I’m not going to take ‘no’ for an answer because I feel so passionate about this opportunity and so confident that this is a fit. So, I reached out to a couple of people on LinkedIn who would either know the hiring manager or at least be in the vicinity of the hiring manager. One of them, fortunately, got back to me and told me that I should reach out to this person, and gave me her email.

Essentially, I said, “I got your contact information from this person. I’m just reaching out to introduce myself. I applied for the senior manager of brand partnerships role. I’ve already received notice that I was denied. But, like anyone in sales, I can’t simply take ‘no’ for an answer, which you can appreciate.”

I also said something like, “I’m a longtime admirer of the company. I wanted to reaffirm my unwavering interest in joining your team, which I would be honored to represent and grow. And basically, “If you’re hiring again in the future, please let me know. I am attaching my résumé, and hoping we can meet in person one of these days.”

This person said, “Thanks for connecting. I’m putting you in contact with the recruiter.

There wasn’t anything malicious about my wanting to email. I was just like, “You’ve got to be kidding me. This doesn’t make any sense. Why would I get not even an initial screening call?”

When I got connected with the recruiter, who is lovely, I had such a great experience. It was almost as if that initial rejection had never happened. We spoke as if she came across my résumé and picked me out as a needle in a haystack, and proceeded as if nothing had ever gone awry earlier on.

Further down the line, when I met with the company’s president, who was my last interview before getting hired, I explained how I was rejected and reached out. He was like, “I can’t believe that you were rejected so quickly. Looking at your résumé, you’re exactly the kind of person that would want for this role, so I’m going to have to look into that.” It was along those lines.

Think about how many people that might be happening to. I don’t know who’s programming these ATS screening agents. The sad part is that it seems like an ever-evolving game. If you don’t play the game, you can kiss your chances goodbye.

What’s behind cold outreaches

If I have an initial interview, and even if I think it goes great, and they get back to me and they’re like, “You didn’t have this kind of experience that we’re looking for” — whatever it is — at least then I’d be like, “OK, fair point. Totally understand.”

But to get an auto-generated, “Thank you, but no thank you” email, it was just like “Hell, no.” After all the years I put into developing a career in this particular path, you can’t tell me that I’m not qualified for at least a screening interview. It’s maddening.

Looking back on when my cold outreach did work, the graciousness and the humanity of the individual who replied to me and told me to reach out to the woman I wrote the email to — if it wasn’t for their goodness, then this never would have happened.

I don’t think they realized this at the time, or that anyone ever realizes this, but the person on the other side really needs your help. Whether they’re struggling at work, struggling in their career broadly, or their family is dependent on them getting a job, there’s always something very weighted. There’s a lot of gravity behind these cold outreaches.

It’s been really discouraging and sad that when I tried that approach again, I was ignored. I don’t know if it’s sort of a symptom of the job market right now or if more people are starting to do similar things, where they’re just barraging hiring managers and people on LinkedIn for jobs because it’s a really tough market out there.

It used to be that you had to know somebody. But in my experience in the last three months, since I’ve been looking for a job, is that it’s now not even a matter of who you know anymore. I don’t have an answer. Hence why I don’t have a job.

Do you have a story to share about your job search? Contact this reporter at tparadis@businessinsider.com.

Read the original article on Business Insider
Categories
Selected Articles

Liam Neeson’s son, Daniel, reacts to actor’s romance with Pamela Anderson

The 28-year-old proudly watched his famous dad appear on “Watch What Happens Live” alongside his “Naked Gun” co-star.
Categories
Selected Articles

Russia’s cognitive warfare emerges as a strategic tool to undermine Western resolve

As Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine grinds on, Moscow has intensified a parallel front less visible but no less dangerous: a systemic campaign of cognitive warfare designed to distort perception, sow doubt, and erode the political will of its adversaries. On August 1, Foreign Policy published an in-depth piece outlining how the Kremlin has weaponized narratives, manipulating minds rather than battlefields in what has become a hallmark of modern hybrid conflict. Unlike traditional disinformation, this cognitive war spans diplomacy, international forums, expert communities, and even seemingly neutral peace initiatives, targeting not just Ukraine but the strategic unity of the West itself.

Moscow exploits uncertainty to weaken Western decision-making

Cognitive warfare is not about overwhelming the enemy with firepower. Instead, it’s about fracturing their ability to act. According to the Institute for the Study of War, Russia systematically engineers cognitive traps—narratives that compel adversaries to question their positions, postpone action, or make concessions on Moscow’s terms. These traps don’t necessarily rely on falsehoods; often, they are built around selectively framed “rational” arguments that exploit existing fatigue or divisions within Western societies. Talk of “war fatigue,” the “cost of supporting Ukraine,” or the “need for compromise” are repackaged as pragmatic concerns, masking their strategic purpose: inaction.

Russia’s cognitive campaign coincides with growing domestic debates in Western capitals about the sustainability of military and financial aid to Ukraine. From Paris to Washington, signs of hesitation—however subtle—reflect the quiet effectiveness of a strategy designed not to provoke but to paralyze. In this environment, even well-meaning calls for peace risk becoming vectors of Kremlin influence.

Beyond propaganda: an integrated, multi-channel campaign

Unlike conventional propaganda, Russia’s cognitive war is deeply integrated and adaptive. It does not rely solely on state media or troll farms. It co-opts respected academics, think tanks, and international conferences to seed narratives that question the West’s strategic coherence. Moscow’s messages often appear not as direct threats, but as “reasonable” alternatives—calls for negotiation, de-escalation, or “realism.”

This approach is particularly effective in Europe, where Russian-aligned political parties, covertly funded media, and algorithmically amplified messages shape public discourse. The Kremlin’s aim is not persuasion through argument but paralysis through confusion. It wants democratic societies to hesitate, to divide, and ultimately to act against their own interests—voluntarily.

Cognitive warfare extends to Russia’s domestic control

While aimed outward, cognitive operations also serve the Kremlin’s internal objectives. Within Russia, the same tools are used to mask economic stagnation, technological decline, and social discontent. Unlike brute-force propaganda, cognitive warfare creates an alternative logic that makes dissent irrational and submission appear reasonable. It is a strategic adaptation of Soviet-era psychological operations, now amplified by digital platforms and AI-driven messaging.

This dual-use of cognitive tactics allows the regime to maintain domestic stability while projecting the illusion of strategic competence abroad. Internally, it replaces repression with resignation; externally, it replaces confrontation with manipulation.

Democratic resilience requires more than fact-checking

Western democracies have long underestimated the scale and sophistication of Russia’s cognitive war. It is not merely a question of detecting lies or debunking fake news. This is a strategic challenge that targets perception itself—aimed at slowing decision-making, fragmenting alliances, and neutralizing resistance without open confrontation.

Countering this threat demands institutional awareness, coordinated information security, and a clear-eyed understanding that “calls for peace” can serve as tools of coercion when they come wrapped in Kremlin-constructed narratives. Russia may lack the economic or technological clout of global superpowers, but it is rapidly becoming one in shaping cognitive space.

In the 21st century, the battlefield is no longer just terrain—it is thought. And in this domain, Russia seeks not merely to fight, but to dominate.

Categories
Selected Articles

From picket lines to power: All major Las Vegas Strip casinos are now unionized

From picket lines to power: All major Las Vegas Strip casinos are now unionized